chr12-57060937-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001130963.2(NEMP1):āc.989G>Cā(p.Cys330Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00157 in 1,613,608 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 33 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001130963.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEMP1 | ENST00000300128.9 | c.989G>C | p.Cys330Ser | missense_variant | 8/9 | 1 | NM_001130963.2 | ENSP00000300128.4 | ||
NEMP1 | ENST00000379391.7 | c.770G>C | p.Cys257Ser | missense_variant | 7/8 | 1 | ENSP00000368701.3 | |||
NEMP1 | ENST00000554340.1 | n.*395G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 7/8 | 1 | ENSP00000452391.1 | ||||
NEMP1 | ENST00000554340.1 | n.*395G>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 7/8 | 1 | ENSP00000452391.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00833 AC: 1267AN: 152158Hom.: 15 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00210 AC: 527AN: 250644Hom.: 7 AF XY: 0.00143 AC XY: 194AN XY: 135510
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000857 AC: 1253AN: 1461332Hom.: 17 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000710 AC XY: 516AN XY: 726994
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00837 AC: 1274AN: 152276Hom.: 16 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00784 AC XY: 584AN XY: 74448
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 16, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at