Variant chr12-65169625-A-T details in Genebe, Genetics Data Aggregator

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_ModerateBS2

The NM_014319.5(LEMD3):c.29A>T(p.Gln10Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000348 in 1,437,228 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q10P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000035 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

LEMD3
NM_014319.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.74

Variant links:

Genes affected

LEMD3 (HGNC:28887): (LEM domain containing 3) This locus encodes a LEM domain-containing protein. The encoded protein functions to antagonize transforming growth factor-beta signaling at the inner nuclear membrane. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. Mutations in this gene have been associated with osteopoikilosis, Buschke-Ollendorff syndrome and melorheostosis.[provided by RefSeq, Nov 2009]

LEMD3 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.17539051).

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
LEMD3	NM_014319.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.29A>T	p.Gln10Leu	missense_variant	1/13	ENST00000308330.3
LEMD3	NM_001167614.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.29A>T	p.Gln10Leu	missense_variant	1/13

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
LEMD3	ENST00000308330.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.29A>T	p.Gln10Leu	missense_variant	1/13	1	NM_014319.5	P1
LEMD3	ENST00000541171.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.43A>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	1/2	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

Cov.:

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00000487

AC:

AN:

205266

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00000891

AC XY:

AN XY:

112266

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000112

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000348

AC:

AN:

1437228

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000561

AC XY:

AN XY:

712800

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000454

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

Cov.:

Alfa

AF:

0.0000414

Hom.:

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Dermatofibrosis lenticularis disseminata

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.15

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.11

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.39

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.97

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.26

Eigen

Benign

-0.34

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.20

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.93

LIST_S2

Benign

0.67

M_CAP

Benign

0.033

MetaRNN

Benign

0.18

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.0

MutationTaster

Benign

0.83

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.77

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.83

REVEL

Benign

0.11

Sift

Benign

0.060

Sift4G

Benign

0.19

Polyphen

0.22

Vest4

0.30

MutPred

0.35

Gain of stability (P = 0.0553);

MVP

0.61

ClinPred

0.45

GERP RS

2.8

Varity_R

0.27

gMVP

0.40

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over