chr12-69610021-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate

The NM_201550.4(LRRC10):ā€‹c.818C>Gā€‹(p.Pro273Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000031 in 1,613,966 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0000014 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

LRRC10
NM_201550.4 missense

Scores

1
2
16

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.305
Variant links:
Genes affected
LRRC10 (HGNC:20264): (leucine rich repeat containing 10) Predicted to enable actin binding activity. Predicted to be involved in cardiac muscle cell development. Predicted to be located in myofibril. Predicted to be active in cytoskeleton and sarcomere. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.13369831).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
LRRC10NM_201550.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.818C>G p.Pro273Arg missense_variant 1/1 ENST00000361484.5 NP_963844.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
LRRC10ENST00000361484.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.818C>G p.Pro273Arg missense_variant 1/1 NM_201550.4 ENSP00000355166 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152230
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000137
AC:
2
AN:
1461736
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00000138
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
727156
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000180
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152230
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000403
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74370
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.00000378
ExAC
AF:
0.00000824
AC:
1

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Dominant Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJun 04, 2020In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies and their clinical significance is uncertain. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with LRRC10-related disease. This variant is present in population databases (rs529860544, ExAC 0.002%). This sequence change replaces proline with arginine at codon 273 of the LRRC10 protein (p.Pro273Arg). The proline residue is moderately conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between proline and arginine. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.075
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.12
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.41
CADD
Benign
10
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.24
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.98
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.99
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.22
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.39
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.045
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.13
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.8
L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.33
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.9
N
REVEL
Benign
0.015
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.010
D
Polyphen
0.23
B
Vest4
0.23
MutPred
0.31
Loss of glycosylation at P273 (P = 0.025);
MVP
0.56
MPC
0.21
ClinPred
0.52
D
GERP RS
1.3
Varity_R
0.044
gMVP
0.53

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs529860544; hg19: chr12-70003801; API