chr12-88083972-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_025114.4(CEP290):c.4705-18C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000843 in 1,437,000 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00052 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00088 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CEP290
NM_025114.4 intron

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.592

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CEP290 (HGNC:29021): (centrosomal protein 290) This gene encodes a protein with 13 putative coiled-coil domains, a region with homology to SMC chromosome segregation ATPases, six KID motifs, three tropomyosin homology domains and an ATP/GTP binding site motif A. The protein is localized to the centrosome and cilia and has sites for N-glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, phosphorylation, N-myristoylation, and amidation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis and the presence of antibodies against this protein is associated with several forms of cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CEP290 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

CEP290-related ciliopathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Joubert syndrome 5
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Leber congenital amaurosis 10
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Leber congenital amaurosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Bardet-Biedl syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Joubert syndrome with oculorenal defect
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Meckel syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Senior-Loken syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

CEP290 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).

BP6

Variant 12-88083972-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-88083972-G-A is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 261846.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_025114.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	CEP290	NM_025114.4	MANE Select	c.4705-18C>T		intron	N/A	NP_079390.3

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
CEP290	ENST00000552810.6	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.4705-18C>T	intron	N/A	ENSP00000448012.1
CEP290	ENST00000547691.8	TSL:1	c.1987-18C>T	intron	N/A	ENSP00000446905.3
CEP290	ENST00000675476.1		c.5566-18C>T	intron	N/A	ENSP00000502161.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000519

AC:

AN:

152090

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000362

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000622

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000868

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000482

AC:

AN:

172066

AF XY:

0.000494

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000210

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000763

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000562

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000990

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000649

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000882

AC:

1133

AN:

1284794

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000885

AC XY:

568

AN XY:

642004

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000101

AC:

AN:

29782

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000170

AC:

AN:

35398

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0000408

AC:

AN:

24484

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000266

AC:

AN:

37630

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000527

AC:

AN:

75854

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000795

AC:

AN:

50310

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000187

AC:

AN:

5360

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00111

AC:

1080

AN:

971766

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000609

AC:

AN:

54210

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.501

Heterozygous variant carriers

111

166

222

277

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

114

152

190

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000519

AC:

AN:

152206

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000538

AC XY:

AN XY:

74416

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000361

AC:

AN:

41556

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

15278

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000623

AC:

AN:

4818

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000868

AC:

AN:

67976

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.510

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000769

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000434

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

3474

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 28, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Joubert syndrome;C0687120:Nephronophthisis

Benign:1

Jan 28, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Senior-Loken syndrome 6;C1857780:Joubert syndrome 5;C1857821:Leber congenital amaurosis 10;C1970161:Meckel syndrome, type 4;C2673874:Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14

Benign:1

Aug 23, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.85

CADD

Benign

1.2

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.33

PhyloP100

0.59

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.030

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over