chr12-88084539-TA-T
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_025114.4(CEP290):c.4704+46delT variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.78 ( 50434 hom., cov: 0)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.91 ( 564349 hom. )
Consequence
CEP290
NM_025114.4 intron
NM_025114.4 intron
Scores
Not classified
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.814
Publications
6 publications found
Genes affected
CEP290 (HGNC:29021): (centrosomal protein 290) This gene encodes a protein with 13 putative coiled-coil domains, a region with homology to SMC chromosome segregation ATPases, six KID motifs, three tropomyosin homology domains and an ATP/GTP binding site motif A. The protein is localized to the centrosome and cilia and has sites for N-glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, phosphorylation, N-myristoylation, and amidation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis and the presence of antibodies against this protein is associated with several forms of cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
CEP290 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- CEP290-related ciliopathyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Joubert syndrome 5Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Leber congenital amaurosis 10Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Leber congenital amaurosisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Bardet-Biedl syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Joubert syndrome with oculorenal defectInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Meckel syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Senior-Loken syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.
BP6
Variant 12-88084539-TA-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-88084539-TA-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 261845.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.942 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.781 AC: 118762AN: 151998Hom.: 50432 Cov.: 0 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
118762
AN:
151998
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.894 AC: 197463AN: 220854 AF XY: 0.901 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
AC:
197463
AN:
220854
AF XY:
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.913 AC: 1225707AN: 1342950Hom.: 564349 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.913 AC XY: 613838AN XY: 672200 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1225707
AN:
1342950
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
613838
AN XY:
672200
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
11728
AN:
29738
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
32188
AN:
35124
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
22077
AN:
24444
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
37201
AN:
38946
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
68177
AN:
76434
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
49597
AN:
51626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
3908
AN:
4392
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
950812
AN:
1026004
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
50019
AN:
56242
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4792
9585
14377
19170
23962
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
19300
38600
57900
77200
96500
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.781 AC: 118778AN: 152116Hom.: 50434 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.787 AC XY: 58548AN XY: 74392 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
118778
AN:
152116
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
58548
AN XY:
74392
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
16986
AN:
41454
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
13227
AN:
15276
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
3106
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
4999
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
4336
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
10221
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
270
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
63055
AN:
67970
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
1738
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
921
1843
2764
3686
4607
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
834
1668
2502
3336
4170
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3064
AN:
3476
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
not provided Benign:1
Jun 26, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.