chr13-20189079-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM1BP4_Strong
The NM_004004.6(GJB2):āc.503A>Gā(p.Lys168Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00011 in 1,614,060 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004004.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000664 AC: 101AN: 152184Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000518 AC: 13AN: 251060Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000589 AC XY: 8AN XY: 135734
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000520 AC: 76AN: 1461758Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000385 AC XY: 28AN XY: 727162
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000663 AC: 101AN: 152302Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000685 AC XY: 51AN XY: 74478
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3
- -
Observed in several unrelated patients with apparently non-syndromic hearing loss in the published literature, often as a single heterozygous variant (PMID: 17357124, 19125024, 20497192, 21728791, 23684175, 29773520); In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19283857, 20022641, 30245029, 25262649, 17357124, 25388846, 17567889, 19125024, 20497192, 23684175, 21728791, 32387678, 19230829, 33096615, 24156272, 20381175, 24158611, 17666888, 19887791, 19081147, 29773520, 36048236) -
This sequence change replaces lysine, which is basic and polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 168 of the GJB2 protein (p.Lys168Arg). This variant is present in population databases (rs200104362, gnomAD 0.04%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with clinical features of GJB2-related conditions (PMID: 17357124, 21728791, 23684175). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 44756). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt GJB2 protein function with a positive predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not specified Uncertain:2Benign:1
Variant summary: GJB2 c.503A>G (p.Lys168Arg) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00067 in 152268 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0057 within the Latino subpopulation in the gnomAD v3.1.1 database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within Latino control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 17-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in GJB2 causing Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss phenotype (0.00034), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Latino origin. c.503A>G has been reported in the literature in the heterozygous state without any other GJB2 pathogenic variants in individuals affected with Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss (e.g. Christiani_2007, Putcha_2007, Samanich_2007, Batissoco_2009, Tsukada_2010, da Silva-Costa_2011, Dalamon_2013, Felix_2019, Figueroa-Ildefonso_2019, Buonfiglio_2020) but it was also reported in unaffected/control individuals (e.g. Samanich_2007, da Silva-Costa_2011). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Six ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as uncertain significance. However, c.503A>G was expert-curated as Likely benign in the Deafness Variation Database (Azaiez_2018). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The p.Lys168Arg variant in GJB2 has been previously reported in >20 individuals with hearing loss, primarily of Brazilian or Latino ancestry (Batisscoco 2009, Christiani 2007, Dalamon 2013, Felix 2019, Fischer 2009, Gravina 2010, Manzoli 2013, Martins 2013, Putcha 2007, Samanich 2007, Shan 2010, Tsukada 2010). However, the variant has not been reported in the homozygous or compound heterozygous state. It has been identified in 0.03% (10/35418) of Latino chromosomes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses suggest that this variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, while the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain, the computational data and the fact that none of the probands had a second variant identified on the other copy of the gene suggests that the variant is more likely benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied: PM2_Supporting, BP4. -
The GJB2 c.503A>G; p.Lys168Arg variant (rs200104362) has been reported in multiple individuals in hearing loss cohorts; however, inheritance and specific clinical information were not provided for these individuals (Batissoco 2009, Manzoli 2013, Samanich 2007, Shearer 2014). The p.Lys168Arg variant is reported in ClinVar (Variant ID: 44756) and is found in the general population with an overall allele frequency of 0.005% (15/282,470 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. The lysine at codon 168 is highly conserved, but computational analyses (SIFT, PolyPhen-2) predict that this variant is tolerated. Given the lack of clinical and functional data, the significance of the p.Lys168Arg variant is uncertain at this time. References: Batissoco et al. Prevalence of GJB2 (connexin-26) and GJB6 (connexin-30) mutations in a cohort of 300 Brazilian hearing-impaired individuals: implications for diagnosis and genetic counseling. Ear Hear. 2009 Feb;30(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819144ad. Manzoli et al. Non-syndromic hearing impairment in a multi-ethnic population of Northeastern Brazil. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jul;77(7):1077-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 May 15. Samanich et al. Mutations in GJB2, GJB6, and mitochondrial DNA are rare in African American and Caribbean Hispanic individuals with hearing impairment. Am J Med Genet A. 2007 Apr 15;143A(8):830-8. Shearer et al. Utilizing ethnic-specific differences in minor allele frequency to recategorize reported pathogenic deafness variants. Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Oct 2;95(4):445-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 25. -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A Uncertain:1
- -
Nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss Uncertain:1
Based on ACMG/AMP guidelines and Hearing Loss Expert Panel specific criteria: the filtering allele frequency of c.503A>G, p.(Lys168Arg) variant in GJB2 gene is 0,015% (10/35418 Latino alleles with 95%CI) from Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; calculated by using inverse allele frequency at https://www.cardiodb.org/allelefrequencyapp/) which meets the criteria to apply to PM2_Supporting rule. Computational evidence predicted a pathogenic effect of the mutation to the protein (REVELscore: 0.720) applying to PP3 criteria. The p.(Lys168Arg) change has been identified only in heterozygous state in several patients (PMID: 17567889, 19125024, 20381175, 20497192, 21728791, 24156272, 19887791). Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is currently uncertain (PM2_Supporting, PP3). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at