chr13-27920235-C-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 1P and 13B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000209.4(PDX1):​c.97C>A​(p.Pro33Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00199 in 1,548,334 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P33A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0020 ( 15 hom. )

Consequence

PDX1
NM_000209.4 missense

Scores

9
5
4

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.58
Variant links:
Genes affected
PDX1 (HGNC:6107): (pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a transcriptional activator of several genes, including insulin, somatostatin, glucokinase, islet amyloid polypeptide, and glucose transporter type 2. The encoded nuclear protein is involved in the early development of the pancreas and plays a major role in glucose-dependent regulation of insulin gene expression. Defects in this gene are a cause of pancreatic agenesis, which can lead to early-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), as well as maturity onset diabetes of the young type 4 (MODY4). [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant in the gene, where a lot of missense mutations are associated with disease in ClinVar. The gene has 7 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 1 curated benign missense variants. Gene score misZ: -0.26592 (below the threshold of 3.09). Trascript score misZ: -1.1553 (below the threshold of 3.09). GenCC associations: The gene is linked to maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 4, pancreatic agenesis 1, monogenic diabetes, maturity-onset diabetes of the young, pancreatic agenesis, permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.03478363).
BP6
Variant 13-27920235-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-27920235-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 36414.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=4, Likely_benign=2, Benign=3}. Variant chr13-27920235-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0018 (274/152286) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.0049 (75/15308). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00401. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 151 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position FAILED quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PDX1NM_000209.4 linkc.97C>A p.Pro33Thr missense_variant Exon 1 of 2 ENST00000381033.5 NP_000200.1 P52945

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PDX1ENST00000381033.5 linkc.97C>A p.Pro33Thr missense_variant Exon 1 of 2 1 NM_000209.4 ENSP00000370421.4 P52945

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00183
AC:
279
AN:
152176
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000482
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00491
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000580
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00496
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000565
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00206
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00335
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00256
AC:
364
AN:
142222
AF XY:
0.00289
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000300
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00197
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000857
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000570
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00119
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00205
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00358
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00201
AC:
2808
AN:
1396048
Hom.:
15
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00212
AC XY:
1462
AN XY:
688488
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000477
AC:
15
AN:
31440
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00264
AC:
94
AN:
35628
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000438
AC:
11
AN:
25122
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000140
AC:
5
AN:
35676
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00607
AC:
480
AN:
79110
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00136
AC:
65
AN:
47714
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00184
AC:
1982
AN:
1077984
Gnomad4 Remaining exome
AF:
0.00228
AC:
132
AN:
57854
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
189
379
568
758
947
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
84
168
252
336
420
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00180
AC:
274
AN:
152286
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00203
AC XY:
151
AN XY:
74464
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000481
AC:
0.000480815
AN:
0.000480815
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00490
AC:
0.0048994
AN:
0.0048994
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000581
AC:
0.000581395
AN:
0.000581395
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00455
AC:
0.00455298
AN:
0.00455298
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000565
AC:
0.000564865
AN:
0.000564865
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00206
AC:
0.00205937
AN:
0.00205937
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00284
AC:
0.00284091
AN:
0.00284091
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
13
26
39
52
65
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00208
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00198
ExAC
AF:
0.00141
AC:
90

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 4 Uncertain:2
Jan 22, 2020
Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

The p.Pro33Thr variant in PDX1 has been reported in 1 individual with maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 4 (PMID: 16092045), but has been identified in 0.7% (164/22330) of South Asian chromosomes as well as other populations at lesser frequencies by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs192902098). This variant has also been reported in ClinVar as having conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity (Variation ID: 36414). In vitro functional studies provide some evidence that the p.Pro33Thr variant may impact protein function (PMID: 16092045, 30930126). However, these types of assays may not accurately represent biological function. Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses suggest that this variant may impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to determine pathogenicity. In summary, the clinical significance of the p.Pro33Thr variant is uncertain. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BA1, PS3_moderate, PP3 (Richards 2015). -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Aug 28, 2024
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Identified in patients with MODY, type 2 diabetes, gestational diabetes, and ketosis-prone diabetes in published literature (PMID: 16092045, 21569088, 19228875), however, also reported in multiple unaffected family members and unaffected controls in these studies; Published functional studies demonstrate a damaging effect due to impaired DNA-binding activity of the protein and misregulation of transcriptional targets (PMID: 16092045, 30930126); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10720084, 12618559, 26543388, 21569088, 30709774, 19228875, 27879211, 29439679, 30930126, 27884173, 34426522, 33565752, Harris2021[CaseReport], 33795639, 34278679, 34741762, 36208030, 34938542, 34988346, 36100423, 35333605, 36178555, 36208343, 16092045) -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
Jan 16, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The variant, PDX1 (legacy gene name IPF1) c.97C>A (p.Pro33Thr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0023 in 169614 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes (gnomAD). The observed variant frequency is approximately 1844 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in PDX1 causing Familial Monogenic Diabetes (Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young 4)/Neonatal Diabetes Mellitus phenotype (1.3e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. However, the phenotype of MODY4 and/or other forms of monogenic/polygenic diabetes in the control individuals within the gnomAD database cannot be excluded. The variant c.97C>A has been reported in the literature in individuals within a single family affected with MODY4 (Gragnoli_2005). However, this study predated the emergence of large control databases such as gnomAD and ExAC. In another report of its presence in an individual(s) with ketone-prone diabetes, the authors conclude that this phenotype is not predominantly a Monogenic Diabetic Syndrome. Lastly, it has been reported in individuals with type 2 diabetes where it was identified at a similar frequency in cases as well as normoglycemic controls (Haaland_2009, Edghill_2011). Therefore, these reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with MODY4 and favor a benign outcome consistent with its high frequency in controls. At least one publication reports a moderate (30-50%) reduction in DNA binding and transcriptional activation functions of this variant in vitro (Gragnoli_2005) however, the implications of this finding to the mechanism and pathophysiology of MOD4 are not clear. One clinical diagnostic laboratory has submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and classified this variant as likely pathogenic. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Jul 31, 2024
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Type 2 diabetes mellitus Uncertain:1
Jul 18, 2019
Baylor Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. This variant has been previously reported in multiple individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) [PMID: 16092045, 19228875, 21569088] -

Maturity onset diabetes mellitus in young Benign:1
Jan 13, 2020
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Monogenic diabetes Benign:1
Jan 18, 2019
Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

ACMG criteria: PP3 (REVEL 0.928 + 10 predictors) + BA1 (0.7% in gnomAD SA, 0.2% in gnomAD Latino and ENF) + PS3 (PMID 16092045, in vitro studies of P33T showed a reduction in DNA-binding and transcriptional activation functions as compared to the wild-type IPF1 protein), BS2 (Five cases and six well-phenotyped controls in PMID: 21569088)= benign Variant found in seven healthy people at risk for T2DM based on fam hx or BMI or lab results in PMID: 27879211, of these people, at least one was glucose tolerant and thin. Variant found in MODY cohort in PMID: 29439679 but authors say unlikely to be cause given frequency of variant in general population -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.72
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.14
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.43
CADD
Pathogenic
27
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.87
D
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.82
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.79
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.84
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.035
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.75
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.9
L
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.79
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-4.3
D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.93
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D
Polyphen
1.0
D
Vest4
0.88
MVP
0.98
MPC
2.1
ClinPred
0.044
T
GERP RS
5.5
Varity_R
0.74
gMVP
0.70
Mutation Taster
=15/85
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs192902098; hg19: chr13-28494372; COSMIC: COSV66847219; COSMIC: COSV66847219; API