chr13-31138435-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_006644.4(HSPH1):c.2342G>A(p.Arg781His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00412 in 1,613,016 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 24 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006644.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPH1 | NM_006644.4 | c.2342G>A | p.Arg781His | missense_variant | 17/18 | ENST00000320027.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPH1 | ENST00000320027.10 | c.2342G>A | p.Arg781His | missense_variant | 17/18 | 1 | NM_006644.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00335 AC: 509AN: 152064Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00326 AC: 817AN: 250742Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00316 AC XY: 428AN XY: 135564
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00420 AC: 6137AN: 1460834Hom.: 22 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00412 AC XY: 2992AN XY: 726734
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00334 AC: 509AN: 152182Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00308 AC XY: 229AN XY: 74416
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jan 01, 2024 | HSPH1: BP4, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at