chr13-32332387-T-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.909T>G(p.Ser303Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000319 in 1,440,010 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S303S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000032 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.580

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
sarcoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Fanconi anemia
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
medulloblastoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).

BP6

Variant 13-32332387-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32332387-T-G is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 215626.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.58 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 link	c.909T>G	p.Ser303Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 27	ENST00000380152.8	NP_000050.3	P51587

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 link	c.909T>G	p.Ser303Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 27	5	NM_000059.4	ENSP00000369497.3	P51587
BRCA2	ENST00000530893.7 link	c.540T>G	p.Ser180Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 27	1		ENSP00000499438.2	A0A590UJI7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 link	n.909T>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 9 of 26	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

Cov.:

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00000840

AC:

AN:

238156

AF XY:

0.00000778

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000182

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000319

AC:

AN:

1440010

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000265

AC XY:

AN XY:

715906

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000310

AC:

AN:

32278

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41080

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25484

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39572

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

81826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53182

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5676

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000399

AC:

AN:

1101412

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000168

AC:

AN:

59500

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.420

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

Cov.:

Alfa

AF:

0.0000540

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000378

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:11

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:1Benign:4

Jun 29, 2017

Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method:curation

Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration (Splicing prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/). -

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Mar 02, 2020

BRCAlab, Lund University

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020

Genetics and Molecular Pathology, SA Pathology

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRCA2 c.909T>G variant is classified as Likely Benign (PM2, BP6, BP7) This BRCA2 c.909T>G variant is synonymous (silent). The variant is rare in population databases (PM2). This synonymous variant does not occur at a highly conserved locus nor is it predicted to impact splicing (BP7). The variant has been reported in dbSNP (rs757430441) and has been reported as Likely benign by other diagnostic laboratories (ClinVar Variation ID: 215626). -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Apr 09, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Aug 30, 2016

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Fanconi anemia complementation group D1

Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified

Benign:1

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

BRCA2-related disorder

Benign:1

Jun 02, 2023

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

not provided

Benign:1

Sep 27, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast

Benign:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRCA2 p.Ser303Ser variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the dbSNP, NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server), HGMD, LOVD, COSMIC, UMD, ClinVar, or BIC databases. The p.Ser303Ser variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as predicted benign. -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Sep 23, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.82

CADD

Benign

3.5

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.66

PhyloP100

0.58

Mutation Taster

=97/3

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over