chr13-32332925-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):āc.1447G>Cā(p.Ala483Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,456,008 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A483S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.1447G>C | p.Ala483Pro | missense_variant | 10/27 | ENST00000380152.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.1447G>C | p.Ala483Pro | missense_variant | 10/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1456008Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 723920
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | Dec 23, 2003 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Jan 21, 2010 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Apr 21, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 27, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 20104584, 10923033, 26287763, 21520273) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington | Mar 23, 2023 | Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 11, 2017 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 01, 2023 | This sequence change replaces alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 483 of the BRCA2 protein (p.Ala483Pro). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 10923033, 20104584, 26287763). This variant is also known as c.1675G>C. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 51126). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA2 protein function with a negative predictive value of 95%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 04, 2020 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.1447G>C (p.Ala483Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 244382 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1447G>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast Cancer (example, Borg_2010, Capanu_2012, Pal_2015). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At-least two co-occurrences with the same pathogenic variant have been reported in the BIC database and at our laboratory respectively (BRCA2 c.8969G>A, p.Trp2990*), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as likely benign. We have not ascertained any actionable evidence in over 4 years since its initial observation at our laboratory. Based on the emerging consensus evidence outlined above, the variant was re-classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at