chr13-32333295-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.1817C>T(p.Pro606Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000143 in 1,604,796 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P606S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.1817C>T | p.Pro606Leu | missense_variant | 10/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.1448C>T | p.Pro483Leu | missense_variant | 10/27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.1817C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 9/26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 151904Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000138 AC: 20AN: 1452892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0000152 AC XY: 11AN XY: 722486
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 151904Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000270 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74196
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:5
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | Jun 23, 2024 | The BRCA2 c.1817C>T (p.Pro606Leu) missense change is absent in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported as pathogenic in individuals with BRCA2-related disease. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Dec 23, 2009 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | May 17, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | BRCAlab, Lund University | Mar 02, 2020 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington | Mar 23, 2023 | Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 05, 2023 | The p.P606L variant (also known as c.1817C>T), located in coding exon 9 of the BRCA2 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 1817. The proline at codon 606 is replaced by leucine, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration was identified in an individual diagnosed with breast cancer (Kim JH et al. Sci Rep, 2021 Apr;11:8485). This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Feb 15, 2023 | This missense variant replaces proline with leucine at codon 606 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in individuals affected with breast cancer (PMID: 33875706, 33471991). In a large breast cancer case-control meta analysis conducted by the BRIDGES consortium, this variant was reported in 2/60466 cases and 3/53461 unaffected controls (OR=0.589 (95%CI 0.098 to 3.528); p-value=0.671) (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_000641). This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Oct 23, 2024 | The BRCA2 c.1817C>T (p.Pro606Leu) variant has been reported in the published literature in individuals with breast cancer (PMIDs: 33471991 (2021), 33875706 (2021), 30415210 (2018), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/)), as well as in reportedly healthy individuals (PMIDs: 33471991 (2021), 32467295 (2020), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/)). This variant has not been reported in large, multi-ethnic general populations (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 22, 2024 | Observed in an individual with a personal history of breast cancer in published literature (PMID: 33875706); Classified as likely benign by a multifactorial analysis incorporating data on co-occurrence, personal and family history, and tumor characteristics (PMID: 30415210); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); Also known as 2045C>T; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10923033, 33054725, 30415210, 33875706) - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 16, 2023 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.1817C>T (p.Pro606Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 240588 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1817C>T has been reported in the literature as a likely benign variant in individuals affected with breast cancer (example, Lee_2018). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Multiple co-occurrences with another pathogenic variant have been reported (BRCA2 c.1819A>T, p.Lys607*), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as (likely benign, n=1; VUS, n=4). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. - |
BRCA2-related cancer predisposition Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | May 30, 2024 | This missense variant replaces proline with leucine at codon 606 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in individuals affected with breast cancer (PMID: 33875706, 33471991). In a large breast cancer case-control meta analysis conducted by the BRIDGES consortium, this variant was reported in 2/60466 cases and 3/53461 unaffected controls (OR=0.589 (95%CI 0.098 to 3.528); p-value=0.671) (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_000641). This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Medulloblastoma;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast;C1838457:Fanconi anemia complementation group D1;C2675520:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2;C2751641:Glioma susceptibility 3;C2931456:Familial prostate cancer;C3150546:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Jan 23, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 25, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at