chr13-32337617-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.3262C>T​(p.Pro1088Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000579 in 1,589,698 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P1088H) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000086 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000055 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

2
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:20

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.303

Publications

21 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
BRCA2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group D1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
  • pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • medulloblastoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.13751572).
BP6
Variant 13-32337617-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32337617-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 37829.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkc.3262C>T p.Pro1088Ser missense_variant Exon 11 of 27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3 P51587

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkc.3262C>T p.Pro1088Ser missense_variant Exon 11 of 27 5 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3 P51587
BRCA2ENST00000530893.7 linkc.2893C>T p.Pro965Ser missense_variant Exon 11 of 27 1 ENSP00000499438.2 A0A590UJI7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkn.3262C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 26 2 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000856
AC:
13
AN:
151954
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000459
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000883
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000429
AC:
10
AN:
233266
AF XY:
0.0000476
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000130
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000556
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000549
AC:
79
AN:
1437744
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000449
AC XY:
32
AN XY:
713064
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
32176
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000124
AC:
5
AN:
40306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
24968
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39452
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
81892
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52700
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5630
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000663
AC:
73
AN:
1101388
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000169
AC:
1
AN:
59232
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.490
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
5
10
14
19
24
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000856
AC:
13
AN:
151954
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000108
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
74192
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41388
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000459
AC:
7
AN:
15248
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10562
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000883
AC:
6
AN:
67970
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2082
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.487
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
2
3
4
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000132
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000642
ExAC
AF:
0.00000824
AC:
1

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:20
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:8
Feb 01, 2022
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 10, 2018
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 17, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27376475, 28651617, 26517685, 23525077, 20858050, 30151275) -

Jul 27, 2017
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 02, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 06, 2022
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:2Benign:4
May 29, 2002
Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 26, 2016
Counsyl
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Oct 01, 2008
Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 15, 2015
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 02, 2022
Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Based on the classification scheme VCGS_Germline_v1.3.4, this variant is classified as Likely Benign. Following criteria are met: 0102 - Loss of function is a known mechanism of disease in this gene and is associated with BRCA2-associated cancers, complementation group D1 fanconi anemia (MIM#605724) and Wilms tumor (MIM#194070). (I) 0108 - This gene is associated with both recessive and dominant disease (OMIM). (I) 0112 - The condition associated with this gene has incomplete penetrance (OMIM). (I) 0200 - Variant is predicted to result in a missense amino acid change from proline to serine. (I) 0251 - This variant is heterozygous. (I) 0302 - Variant is present in gnomAD (v3) <0.001 for a condition (13 heterozygotes, 0 homozygotes). (SP) 0309 - An alternative amino acid change at the same position has been observed in gnomAD (v2) (1 heterozygote, 0 homozygotes). (I) 0504 - Same amino acid change has been observed in placental mammals. (SB) 0604 - Variant is not located in an established domain, motif, hotspot or informative constraint region. (I) 0710 - Other missense variants comparable to the one identified in this case have inconclusive previous evidence for pathogenicity. These alternative changes (p.Pro1088Ala, p.Pro1088Leu) have been reported as VUS (ClinVar). (I) 0808 - Previous reports of pathogenicity for this variant are conflicting. This variant has been reported multiple times as likely benign, benign and as a VUS (LOVD, ClinVar, PMID: 31131967), and has been observed to be equally distributed among cancer cohorts and controls (PMID: 33471991). (I) Legend: (SP) - Supporting pathogenic, (I) - Information, (SB) - Supporting benign -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:4
Jan 10, 2022
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Mar 23, 2023
University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -

Oct 31, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Oct 21, 2024
Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

PP4_Supporting, BP1_Strong c.3262C>T, located in exon 11 of the BRCA2 gene, is predicted to result in the substitution of Proline by Serine at codon 1088, p.(Pro1088Ser). This position is outside a (potentially) clinically important functional domain and, moreover, the SpliceAI algorithm predicts no significant impact on splicing (BP1_strong).c.3262C>T, located in exon 11 of the BRCA2 gene, is predicted to result in the substitution of proline by serine at codon 1088, p.(Pro1088Ser). This position is outside a (potentially) clinically important functional domain and, moreover, the SpliceAI algorithm predicts no significant impact on splicing (BP1_strong). This variant is found in 10/250152 alleles at a frequency of 0.0039% in the gnomAD v2.1.1 database, non-cancer dataset. Published clinical data for a multifactorial likelihood analysis (PMID: 31131967) showed a combined LR indicative of supporting evidence towards pathogenicity (LR 2.31), based on segregation (LR 0.946), tumour characteristics (LR 1.897), co-occurrence (LR 1.707) and family history (LR 0.75) (PP4_Supporting). This variant has been reported in the ClinVar database (3x uncertain significance, 9x likely benign and 3x benign) in the LOVD database (1x uncertain significance, 1x not classified and 1x likely benign) and in BRCA Exchange database as not yet reviewed Based on currently available information, the variant c.3262C>T should be considered a likely benign variant. -

Jun 22, 2016
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Dec 19, 2023
German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

BRCA2 "coldspot" variant. According to the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA2 v1.0.0 criteria we chose these criteria: BP1 (strong benign): missense outside a (potentially) clinically important functional domain AND no splicing predicted (SpliceAI ≤0.1), BS1 (supporting benign): FAF > 0.00002 -

Jan 28, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
Mar 28, 2021
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.3262C>T (p.Pro1088Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.3e-05 in 233286 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (4.3e-05 vs 0.00075), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.3262C>T has been reported in the literature as a reportedly somatic occurrence in non-MSI positive samples from patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (example, Dulac_2013) and in the MSI instable FFPE specimen derived from a patient with hereditary endometrial carcinoma in whom a germline pathogenic variant in the MSH6 gene had been identified (Jori_2015, patient 5, MSI unstable, MSH6 variant c.3729_3732dupATTA). The variant has also been reported as a germline mutation in the literature in patients with breast/ovarian cancer and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), without strong evidence for causality (example, Coulet_2010, Buzolin_2017, Schenkel_2016, Chandrasekharappa_2017). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Multiple co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported in the BIC database (2 - BRCA1 exon13ins6kb, 1 - BRCA1 c.3549_3550delinsT (p.K1183fsX), and 1 - BRCA1 c.4357+1G>A), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Ten clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (benign/likely benign, n=8, VUS, n=2). Taken together, based on at-least 5 reports of the occurrence of this variant in patients with an alternative molecular basis of disease attributed to mutations in MSH6 (n=1) or BRCA1 (n=4) genes and the majority concordance among peers supporting a neutral outcome as outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

BRCA2-related cancer predisposition Benign:1
Mar 12, 2020
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.095
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.26
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.40
CADD
Benign
2.3
DANN
Benign
0.62
Eigen
Benign
-0.66
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.67
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.29
N
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.11
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.14
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.92
T
PhyloP100
0.30
PrimateAI
Benign
0.25
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.0
D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.17
Sift
Benign
0.30
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.47
T;T
Vest4
0.18
MutPred
0.33
Loss of catalytic residue at P1088 (P = 0.1583);Loss of catalytic residue at P1088 (P = 0.1583);
MVP
0.80
MPC
0.024
ClinPred
0.034
T
GERP RS
2.7
gMVP
0.20
Mutation Taster
=87/13
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358572; hg19: chr13-32911754; COSMIC: COSV66455846; COSMIC: COSV66455846; API