chr13-32338070-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4BP6
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):āc.3715A>Gā(p.Lys1239Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000931 in 1,611,606 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.3715A>G | p.Lys1239Glu | missense_variant | 11/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.3346A>G | p.Lys1116Glu | missense_variant | 11/27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.3715A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 10/26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8AN: 152206Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000803 AC: 2AN: 249020Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 134532
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000480 AC: 7AN: 1459400Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 725718
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8AN: 152206Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74366
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 16, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington | Mar 23, 2023 | Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 23, 2017 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Feb 28, 2020 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.3715A>G (p.Lys1239Glu) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8e-06 in 249020 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.3715A>G in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (likely benign, n=4; VUS, n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, and in consideration of the prevailing consensus, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Apr 19, 2024 | The BRCA2 c.3715A>G (p.Lys1239Glu) variant has been reported in the published literature to be located in a region of the BRCA2 gene that is tolerant to missense sequence changes (PMID: 31911673 (2020)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00017 (4/23930 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 15, 2021 | - - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | May 29, 2012 | - - |
BRCA2-related cancer predisposition Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Jul 29, 2024 | - - |
BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 19, 2024 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 14, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at