chr13-32339810-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.5455C>T(p.Pro1819Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000115 in 1,613,682 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.5455C>T | p.Pro1819Ser | missense_variant | 11/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.5455C>T | p.Pro1819Ser | missense_variant | 11/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.5086C>T | p.Pro1696Ser | missense_variant | 11/27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.5455C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 10/26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13AN: 152138Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000195 AC: 49AN: 251108Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000169 AC XY: 23AN XY: 135800
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000118 AC: 173AN: 1461544Hom.: 0 Cov.: 47 AF XY: 0.000139 AC XY: 101AN XY: 727076
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13AN: 152138Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000942 AC XY: 7AN XY: 74316
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Sep 30, 2008 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Aug 10, 2015 | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.00000012 - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA2 p.Pro1819Ser variant was identified in 1 of 228 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.004) from individuals or families with breast cancer (Spearman 2008). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80358768) NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server), HGMD, LOVD, the ClinVar database (classified as a benign variant by the Sharing Clinical Reports Project, derived from Myriad reports, as a likely benign variant by GeneDx and as uncertain significance by BIC), Gene Insight through the Canadian Open Genetics Repository (http://opengenetics.ca/) (1X, by a clinical laboratory as ‘not classified’), the BIC database (40X with unknown clinical importance) and UMD (4X as a likely neutral variant). This variant was identified by our laboratory in one individual where a second co-occuring pathogenic variant was identified in BRCA1 (c.843_846delCTCA, p.Ser282TyrfsX15), increasing the likelihood this variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was identified by the Exome Variant Server project in 1 of 8600 European American (frequency: 0.0001), although this low number of observations and low frequency is not substantive enough to determine the prevalence of the variant in the general population and its relationship to disease. The p.Pro1819 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In addition, two in silico studies using either a multifactorial-likelihood model or tumour histopathology characteristics predict the variant to be neutral (Easton 2007, Spearman 2008) increasing the likelihood this variant may not have clinical significance. In summary, based on the above information, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | BRCAlab, Lund University | Mar 02, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 07, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 08, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 17924331, 24323938, 20589654, 11556836, 21990134, 26182991, 28324225, 28525389, 26119842, 18824701) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 22, 2016 | Variant summary: The BRCA2 c.5455C>T (p.Pro1819Ser) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 3/5 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. A multifactorial probability based model showed this variant is neutral (Lindor_2012). This variant was found in 23/121138 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0001899, which does not exceed the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRCA2 variant (0.0007503). This variant has been found in numerous individuals who also carry a pathogenic BRCA variant, suggesting this variant is unlikely to associate with the disease. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Mar 01, 2024 | BRCA2: BP4 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 03, 2019 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jun 03, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 19, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jul 29, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | May 23, 2018 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 21, 2019 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Nov 06, 2023 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 07, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jul 29, 2022 | - - |
See cases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratorio de Genetica e Diagnostico Molecular, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein | Mar 24, 2022 | ACMG classification criteria: BS1, BS2, BP4 - |
Breast carcinoma Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Centre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana | Sep 21, 2015 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at