chr13-32340099-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.5744C>T​(p.Thr1915Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0265 in 1,613,612 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 679 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T1915T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.018 ( 31 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.027 ( 648 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

15

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:40O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.10
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0026650429).
BP6
Variant 13-32340099-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32340099-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 41556.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32340099-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-32340099-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr13-32340099-C-T is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0179 (2719/152214) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0306 (2081/67978). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0295. There are 31 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1269 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 31 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.5744C>T p.Thr1915Met missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.5744C>T p.Thr1915Met missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0179
AC:
2719
AN:
152096
Hom.:
31
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00579
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00548
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0115
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0176
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00849
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00754
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0306
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0168
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0176
AC:
4420
AN:
250908
Hom.:
55
AF XY:
0.0180
AC XY:
2446
AN XY:
135670
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00543
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00892
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0160
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00886
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00866
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0290
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0196
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0274
AC:
40071
AN:
1461398
Hom.:
648
Cov.:
49
AF XY:
0.0271
AC XY:
19723
AN XY:
726980
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00433
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00892
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0167
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000151
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00985
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0115
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0325
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0240
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0179
AC:
2719
AN:
152214
Hom.:
31
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0170
AC XY:
1269
AN XY:
74432
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00578
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0114
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0176
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00850
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00754
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0306
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0166
Alfa
AF:
0.0266
Hom.:
148
Bravo
AF:
0.0174
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0294
AC:
109
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0324
AC:
125
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00567
AC:
25
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0291
AC:
250
ExAC
AF:
0.0179
AC:
2167
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00577
AC:
21
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0261
EpiControl
AF:
0.0258

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:40Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:11
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMichigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of MichiganNov 03, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylJan 02, 2014- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Jan 12, 2015Class 1 not pathogenic based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.02375 (European), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30). -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Mar 15, 2011- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)Dec 17, 2010- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyPathway GenomicsJul 24, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtOct 09, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
not specified Benign:11Other:1
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer AgencyApr 19, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJun 15, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJun 29, 2015p.Thr1915Met in exon 11 of BRCA2: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 2.7% (1814/66580) of European chr omosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.o rg; dbSNP rs4987117) and due to a lack of conservation across species, including >20 mammals which have a methionine (Met) at this position. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Apr 09, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 16, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA2 p.Thr1915Met variant was identified in 264 of 11658 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.02) from individuals or families with breast and ovarian cancer (Borg 2010, D'Argenio 2015, Garre 2015, Schenkel 2016, Jalkh 2012, Serrano-Fernandez 2009, Meyer 2012, Cherbal 2012). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs4987117) as "With other allele", ClinVar (20X benign including review by expert panel ENIGMA, 3x likely benign, 2x uncertain significance), Clinvitae, GeneInsight-COGR (5x benign), Cosmic (3x, confirmed somatic, carcinoma of the large intestine and soft tissue), LOVD 3.0 (108x, predicted neutral), and the BIC Database (16x, not pathogenic). In UMD (41x, neutral biological significance) the variant was identified with co-occurring pathogenic variants: BRCA1 c.5137delG (p.Val1713X) and c.5266dup (p.Gln1756ProfsX74), BRCA2 c.3009_3010delCA (p.His1003GlnfsX5), c.5073dup (p.Trp1692MetfsX3), c.6405_6409delCTTAA (p.Asn2135LysfsX3), and c.7805G>C (p.Arg2602Thr), increasing the likelihood that the p.Thr1915Met variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was also identified by our laboratory in one individual with breast cancer. The variant was not identified in MutDB, ARUP Laboratories, or the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 4962 of 276776 chromosomes (61 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.02 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 125 of 24016 chromosomes (freq: 0.005), Other in 123 of 6456 chromosomes (freq: 0.02), Latino in 304 of 34410 chromosomes (freq: 0.01), European in 3746 of 126392 chromosomes (freq: 0.03), Ashkenazi Jewish in 161 of 10142 chromosomes (freq: 0.02), East Asian in 2 of 18860 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), Finnish in 229 of 25748 chromosomes (freq: 0.009), and South Asian in 272 of 30752 chromosomes (freq: 0.009). The p.Thr1915 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's UniversityApr 20, 2017- -
not provided Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 27, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicDec 28, 2016- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingVantari GeneticsDec 17, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Apr 26, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 10, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsDec 01, 2017- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaMar 25, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchGenetics Program, Instituto Nacional de CancerNov 01, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 15, 2014- -
Breast neoplasm Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchA.C.Camargo Cancer Center / LGBM, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center-- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsFeb 23, 2017- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.063
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.51
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
CADD
Benign
0.032
DANN
Benign
0.063
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0024
N
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0027
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.22
T
PROVEAN
Benign
2.7
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.14
Sift
Benign
0.33
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.38
T;T
Vest4
0.065
MPC
0.020
ClinPred
0.0068
T
GERP RS
0.62
gMVP
0.14

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4987117; hg19: chr13-32914236; COSMIC: COSV66459591; API