chr13-32344569-A-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.6853A>G(p.Ile2285Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000235 in 1,545,204 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00023 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:28

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.35

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.012097985).

BP6

Variant 13-32344569-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32344569-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 38070.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32344569-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-32344569-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 link	c.6853A>G	p.Ile2285Val	missense_variant	Exon 12 of 27	ENST00000380152.8	NP_000050.3	P51587

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 link	c.6853A>G	p.Ile2285Val	missense_variant	Exon 12 of 27	5	NM_000059.4	ENSP00000369497.3	P51587
BRCA2	ENST00000530893.7 link	c.6484A>G	p.Ile2162Val	missense_variant	Exon 12 of 27	1		ENSP00000499438.2	A0A590UJI7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 link	n.6853A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 11 of 26	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000263

AC:

AN:

152170

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00864

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000447

AC:

110

AN:

246154

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000419

AC XY:

AN XY:

133668

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000118

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00934

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000338

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000626

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00100

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000232

AC:

323

AN:

1393034

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000241

AC XY:

168

AN XY:

696264

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000685

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00918

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000239

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000437

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000604

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000263

AC:

AN:

152170

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000296

AC XY:

AN XY:

74340

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00864

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000704

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000249

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000230

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000235

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000272

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000546

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:28

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:1Benign:12

May 29, 2002

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Sep 21, 2015

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 30, 2014

Pathway Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 10, 2015

Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: curation

IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.00000000026 -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 02, 2014

Counsyl

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: literature only

- -

Jan 16, 2008

Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 02, 2020

BRCAlab, Lund University

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 09, 2014

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 21, 2016

Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2016

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:5

Jun 07, 2018

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 31, 2018

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRCA2 p.Ile2285Val variant was identified in 17 of 1950 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.009) from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer and was present in 10 of 950 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.01) from healthy individuals (Ding 2011, Li 2009, Shih 2000). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs56272235) as "With other allele", ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae and 10 other submitters; as likely benign by three submitters; as uncertain significance by BIC and one other submitter), COGR, MutDB, LOVD 3.0 (13x as benign or likely benign), UMD-LSDB (10x as likely neutral), BIC Database (80x with unknown significance), and in ARUP Laboratories (not pathogenic or of no clinical significance). The variant was not identified in the Cosmic or Zhejiang University databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 104 of 273028 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.0004 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Ashkenazi Jewish in 89 of 9928 chromosomes (freq: 0.009), Other in 5 of 6360 chromosomes (freq: 0.0008), Latino in 4 of 33852 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), European in 5 of 125038 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), and South Asian in 1 of 29758 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003); it was not observed in the African, East Asian, or Finnish populations. The p.Ile2285 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In addition, several functional studies have predicted that this variant is neutral (Tavtigian 2006, Easton 2007, Frank 2002, Guidugli 2014, Lindor 2012). This variant has also been identified as co-occurring with pathogenic variants in BRCA2: c.5946delT, p.S1982Rfs*22 (Li 2009) and c.2957dupA, p.Asn986Lysfs*2 (this laboratory), increasing the likelihood this variant does not have clinical significance. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:4

Oct 04, 2015

Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 27, 2021

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 19, 2022

National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Feb 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BRCA2: BP4, BS1 -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Jul 13, 2012

Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: flagged submission

Collection Method: research

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Nov 19, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dec 15, 2014

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 30, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Benign:1

Jul 17, 2019

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast

Benign:1

Feb 01, 2025

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.10

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.064

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.10

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

Eigen

Uncertain

0.19

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.25

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.82

M_CAP

Benign

0.082

MetaRNN

Benign

0.012

T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.27

PrimateAI

Benign

0.29

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.27

N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.43

Sift

Uncertain

0.0030

D;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.023

D;D

Vest4

0.37

MVP

0.83

MPC

0.083

ClinPred

0.059

GERP RS

5.0

gMVP

0.12

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over