chr13-32355160-A-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.7307A>T(p.Asn2436Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000335 in 1,613,794 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000036 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.264

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.24806172).

BP6

Variant 13-32355160-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32355160-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 52306.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32355160-A-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-32355160-A-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 link	c.7307A>T	p.Asn2436Ile	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 27	ENST00000380152.8	NP_000050.3	P51587

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 link	c.7307A>T	p.Asn2436Ile	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 27	5	NM_000059.4	ENSP00000369497.3	P51587
BRCA2	ENST00000530893.7 link	c.6938A>T	p.Asn2313Ile	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 27	1		ENSP00000499438.2	A0A590UJI7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 link	n.7307A>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 13 of 26	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152178

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000386

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000119

AC:

AN:

251242

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000147

AC XY:

AN XY:

135794

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000109

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000356

AC:

AN:

1461616

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000371

AC XY:

AN XY:

727126

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00121

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000662

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152178

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74326

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000386

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000434

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000113

ExAC

AF:

0.00000824

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:9

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:1Benign:2

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 10, 2015

Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: curation

IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000234 -

Feb 20, 2004

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Jan 27, 2023

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 21, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 17924331, 11149425, 29338689, 29770616, 21990134, 24323938, 28866612, 28111427, 29192238, 28591652, 29731985, 30415210, 32444794, 32426482) -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Nov 19, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dec 15, 2015

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Oct 10, 2019

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.7307A>T (p.Asn2436Ile) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00053 in 298704 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database. However, the variant was reported in some East Asian subpopulations with an even higher allele frequency, e.g. in the Japanese, with an allele frequency of 0.0039 (in the jMorp database). This frequency is about 5 fold higher than the maximum expected for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (0.00075), suggesting the variant could be a benign polymorphism found in population(s) from East Asia. The variant, c.7307A>T, has been reported in the literature in individuals of East Asian origin, who were affected with breast and/or ovarian cancer and fallopian tube carcinoma (Choi_2018, Kim_2017, Ikeda_2001). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Two recent case-control association studies, involving breast cancer patients and controls of Korean (Park_2017) and Japanese ancestry (Momozawa_2018), found that the variant is not associated with a significant increase risk for breast/ovarian cancer, and therefore the authors of these studies classified the variant as likely benign/benign, respectively. In addition, IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis suggests the variant to be benign (Lindor_2012, Easton_2007). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Four other submitters, including one expert panel (ENIGMA) have provided clinical-significance assessments for this variant in ClinVar after 2014, and classified the variant as likely benign (2x) / benign (2x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Malignant tumor of breast

Benign:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRCA2 p.Asn2436Ile variant was identified in the literature however the frequency of this variant in an affected population was not provided. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80358955) as With Uncertain significance allele, ClinVar (classified as benign by ENIGMA, Ambry Genetics; classified as likely benign by GeneDx; classified as uncertain significance by Invitae, BIC), LOVD 3.0 (predicted neutral), UMD-LSDB (1X classified as uncertain significance), BIC Database (2X with unknown clinical importance), ARUP Laboratories (with not pathogenic or of no clinical significance), databases. The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 3 of 246016 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000012, however with this low number the prevalence of this variant in the general population could not be determined. (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.Asn2436 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant is located with the Breast cancer type 2 susceptibility protein functional domain increasing the likelihood that it may have clinical significance. In addition, functional study by Easton (2007) identify the variant has odds in favor of neutrality 132 and cosegregation with disease in pedigree-.41. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 19, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.097

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.15

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.22

CADD

Benign

2.3

DANN

Benign

0.94

Eigen

Benign

-0.81

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.87

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.087

M_CAP

Benign

0.047

MetaRNN

Benign

0.25

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.89

PrimateAI

Benign

0.36

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.9

N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.47

Sift

Benign

0.16

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.23

T;T

Vest4

0.50

MutPred

0.14

Loss of loop (P = 0.0512);Loss of loop (P = 0.0512);

MVP

0.84

MPC

0.031

ClinPred

0.026

GERP RS

1.1

gMVP

0.19

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over