chr13-32363187-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM1BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.7985C>T​(p.Thr2662Met) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000281 in 1,460,966 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T2662K) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000028 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

15

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.75

Publications

18 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
BRCA2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group D1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
  • pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • medulloblastoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 12 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 6 benign, 27 uncertain in NM_000059.4
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.13731232).
BP6
Variant 13-32363187-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32363187-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 184089.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000059.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
BRCA2
NM_000059.4
MANE Select
c.7985C>Tp.Thr2662Met
missense
Exon 18 of 27NP_000050.3
BRCA2
NM_001432077.1
c.7985C>Tp.Thr2662Met
missense
Exon 18 of 27NP_001419006.1
BRCA2
NM_001406720.1
c.7985C>Tp.Thr2662Met
missense
Exon 18 of 27NP_001393649.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
BRCA2
ENST00000380152.8
TSL:5 MANE Select
c.7985C>Tp.Thr2662Met
missense
Exon 18 of 27ENSP00000369497.3
BRCA2
ENST00000544455.6
TSL:1
c.7985C>Tp.Thr2662Met
missense
Exon 18 of 27ENSP00000439902.1
BRCA2
ENST00000530893.7
TSL:1
c.7616C>Tp.Thr2539Met
missense
Exon 18 of 27ENSP00000499438.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00000400
AC:
1
AN:
250098
AF XY:
0.00000739
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000885
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000281
AC:
41
AN:
1460966
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000358
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
726828
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44716
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39670
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000232
AC:
2
AN:
86228
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53030
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000333
AC:
37
AN:
1111564
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000331
AC:
2
AN:
60380
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
4
7
9
11
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Alfa
AF:
0.0000180
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00000756
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Apr 20, 2017
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 01, 2018
GeneKor MSA
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 22, 2020
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

not provided Uncertain:2
Oct 17, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is denoted BRCA2 c.7985C>T at the cDNA level, p.Thr2662Met (T2662M) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Threonine to a Methionine (ACG>ATG). Using alternate nomenclature, this variant would be defined as BRCA2 8213C>T. In a minigene assay, BRCA2 Thr2662Met was shown to result in 3.3% of transcripts skipping exon 18, a naturally occurring isoform (Fraile-Bethencourt 2017). BRCA2 Thr2662Met was not observed at a significant allele frequency in large population cohorts (Lek 2016). This variant is located within the DNA binding domain (Yang 2002). In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function. Based on currently available information, it is unclear whether BRCA2 Thr2662Met is pathogenic or benign. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance.

Mar 05, 2020
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Jan 23, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 02, 2025
German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

According to the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA2 v1.1.0 criteria we chose these criteria: PP4 (supporting pathogenic): Combined LR Score 2.21201 (Parsons et al.), BP4 (supporting benign): BayesDel: -0.2316; spliceAI:0.01, BS3 (strong benign): Reported by one calibrated study to exhibit protein function similar to benign control variants (PMID:33609447) (BS3 met).

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1
Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Christian Medical College
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BRCA2-related cancer predisposition Uncertain:1
Sep 30, 2019
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:1
Apr 09, 2022
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.7985C>T (p.Thr2662Met) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Breast cancer type 2 susceptibility protein, helical domain (IPR015252) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing, which was confirmed by one functional study (Fraile-Bethencourt_2017). The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-06 in 250098 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.7985C>T has been reported in the literature as a VUS in one individual who had personal or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (example, Tsaousis_2019) and in control cohorts (example, Dorling_2021). These report(s) does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. At-least two co-occurrences with another pathogenic variant has been reported in the UMD database and at our laboratory (UMD-BRCA1 c.5080G>T, p.Glu1694X; our laboratory-BRCA2 c.3915del, p.Phe1305fs), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. At least two publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function demonstrating no damaging effect in a homology-directed repair (HDR) assay (example, Hart_2018, Richardson_2021). HDR assays qualify as a recognized gold standard on the basis of updated guidance provided by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation (SVI) working group. This working group has recommended strong functional evidence (ACMG BS3) as sufficient weightage for categorization as likely benign (Tavtigian_2018). Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (VUS, n=4; Likely benign/Benign, n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign.

Hereditary cancer Benign:1
Sep 11, 2024
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following: it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease, and/or has normal protein function, and/or has lack of segregation with disease, and/or has been detected in co-occurrence with known pathogenic variant, and/or has lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or is located in a region inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.047
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
0.0043
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.23
CADD
Benign
19
DANN
Benign
0.70
Eigen
Benign
-0.73
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.52
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.10
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.069
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.14
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.82
T
PhyloP100
4.8
PrimateAI
Benign
0.25
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.88
N
REVEL
Benign
0.24
Sift
Benign
0.26
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.23
T
Vest4
0.20
MVP
0.86
MPC
0.020
ClinPred
0.14
T
GERP RS
4.9
gMVP
0.23
Mutation Taster
=44/56
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs431825362; hg19: chr13-32937324; COSMIC: COSV99061603; API