chr13-32363286-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM1BP6
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.8084C>T(p.Ser2695Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000547 in 1,461,852 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S2695S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.8084C>T | p.Ser2695Leu | missense_variant | 18/27 | ENST00000380152.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.8084C>T | p.Ser2695Leu | missense_variant | 18/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251296Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135818
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000547 AC: 8AN: 1461852Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 727224
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | Jun 20, 2002 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 21, 2022 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.8084C>T (p.Ser2695Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the BRCA2, OB1 domain (IPR015187) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-06 in 251296 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.8084C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast Cancer (e.g. Biswas_2012, Caputo_2021, Dorling_2021), but the variant was found to poorly segregate with disease within families (Biswas_2012), giving a likelihood ratio that suggested neutrality and an IARC score of 1-benign (Caputo_2021). Co-occurrences with pathogenic variants have been reported (e.g. BRCA1 c.140G>A [p.Cys47Tyr]; BRCA2 c.9294C>A [p.Tyr3098Ter]; UMD database), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Several publications have provided experimental evidence evaluating the impact of the variant on protein function and demonstrated there was no damaging effect: the variant was capable of complementing Brca2 knockout ES cells (Biswas_2012), was insensitive to DNA damaging agents (Biswas_2012), and had functional HDR activity (Biswas_2012, Richardson_2021). Four ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: two classified the variant as uncertain significance and two as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Feb 06, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2022 | BRCA2: PM2, BP4, BS3:Moderate - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 19, 2019 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29387975, 24323938, 19043619, 22678057) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 25, 2020 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Nov 23, 2022 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 01, 2023 | In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect BRCA2 function (PMID: 22678057, 24323938). Advanced modeling performed at Invitae incorporating data from internal and/or published experimental studies (PMID: 33609447) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA2 function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 52500). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with BRCA2-related conditions. This variant is present in population databases (rs80359048, gnomAD 0.0009%). This sequence change replaces serine, which is neutral and polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 2695 of the BRCA2 protein (p.Ser2695Leu). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at