chr13-32376699-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.8662C>T(p.Arg2888Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000013 in 1,613,910 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R2888L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- Fanconi anemia complementation group D1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
- pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- sarcomaInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Fanconi anemiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- medulloblastomaInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.8662C>T | p.Arg2888Cys | missense_variant | Exon 21 of 27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.8662C>T | p.Arg2888Cys | missense_variant | Exon 21 of 27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
| BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.8293C>T | p.Arg2765Cys | missense_variant | Exon 21 of 27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
| BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.*720C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 20 of 26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 | ||||
| BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.*720C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 20 of 26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8AN: 152138Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000279 AC: 7AN: 251324 AF XY: 0.0000294 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000889 AC: 13AN: 1461772Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000963 AC XY: 7AN XY: 727198 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8AN: 152138Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000807 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74306 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:3
- -
IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.0000248 -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:4
- -
- -
Variant summary: BRCA2 c.8662C>T (p.Arg2888Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the BRCA2, OB2 domain (IPR048262) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.8e-05 in 251324 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.8662C>T has been reported in the literature in families/individuals affected with breast and/or ovarian cancer as well as unaffected controls (van der Hout_2006, Easton_2007, Gomez Garcia_2008, Brandao_2011, Dorling_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (e.g. BRCA2 c.5350_5351del, p.Asn1784fs), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (Brandao_2011, Guidugli_2018, Mesman_2019). These results showed no damaging effect of this variant. Systematic genetic assessment and multifactorial probability modeling has also suggested the variant to have a high odds of neutrality and low odds of pathogenicity (Easton_2007, Lindor_2012). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 21990134, 19200354, 17924331, 24323938, 23231788, 16683254, 21638052, 29394989, 29988080, 33471991). Seven submitters, including an expert panel, have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. All submitters classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
- -
not provided Benign:4
- -
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21990134, 16683254, 19200354, 21638052, 21673748, 24323938, 19043619, 29988080, 29394989, 29884841, 17924331) -
- -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at