chr13-32379828-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 4P and 1B. PM2PP3_ModerateBP6
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):āc.9032T>Cā(p.Leu3011Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000248 in 1,613,152 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š: 0.0000014 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
8
6
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.51
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.865
BP6
Variant 13-32379828-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32379828-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 52732.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=9}.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.9032T>C | p.Leu3011Pro | missense_variant | 23/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.9032T>C | p.Leu3011Pro | missense_variant | 23/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.8663T>C | p.Leu2888Pro | missense_variant | 23/27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.*1090T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 22/26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 | ||||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.*1090T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 22/26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152238Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
152238
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1460914Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726788
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
1460914
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
726788
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152238Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74380
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
152238
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74380
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
1
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:10Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:2Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Aug 03, 2012 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | Dec 23, 2003 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Dec 23, 2016 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 15, 2023 | This missense variant replaces leucine with proline at codon 3011 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Functional studies have reported that this variant has normal or intermediate homology-directed DNA repair activity (PMID: 29394989, 35736817). This variant has been detected in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 0/60463 cases and 1/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_000395) and in a suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer family (PMID: 27376475). This variant also has been reported in 2 individuals age 70 years or older without cancer in the FLOSSIES database. This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jul 21, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 11, 2022 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Mar 01, 2022 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 06, 2019 | Not observed in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23704879, 19043619, 27376475, 22228431, 10923033, 29394989, 29884841) - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 15, 2023 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.9032T>C (p.Leu3011Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 250554 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.9032T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals evaluated for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (Schenkel_2016), and Ovarian Cancer (Hauke_2022). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Co-occurrence with at least one other pathogenic variant has been reported (BRCA1 c.66_67insA, p.Leu22_Glu23fs, BIC database), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Two publications reporting experimental evidence evaluating the impact of the variant on protein function have conflicting results: one publication showed that the variant protein had approximately 40% of normal homology-directed repair activity, showing it has an intermediate level of activity (Guidugli_2018). Another publication showed the variant protein had normal homology-directed repair activity (Hu_2022). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 29394989, 29884841, 33273034, 35736817, 19043619, 22228431, 27376475, 23704879, 33471991). Eight ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: six classified the variant as uncertain significance and two as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
Fanconi anemia Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
BRCA2-related cancer predisposition Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Sep 16, 2024 | This missense variant replaces leucine with proline at codon 3011 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Functional studies have reported that this variant has normal or intermediate homology-directed DNA repair activity (PMID: 29394989, 35736817). This variant has been detected in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 0/60463 cases and 1/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_000395) and in a suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer family (PMID: 27376475). This variant also has been reported in 2 individuals age 70 years or older without cancer in the FLOSSIES database. This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Uncertain
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.19
ClinPred
D
GERP RS
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at