chr13-32398536-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.10023C>T(p.Asp3341=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000291 in 1,614,124 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000029 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA2
NM_000059.4 synonymous
NM_000059.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.277
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.34).
BP6
Variant 13-32398536-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32398536-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 184877.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32398536-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.277 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.10023C>T | p.Asp3341= | synonymous_variant | 27/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.10023C>T | p.Asp3341= | synonymous_variant | 27/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
152186
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 250960Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000221 AC XY: 3AN XY: 135708
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
250960
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135708
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000287 AC: 42AN: 1461820Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000316 AC XY: 23AN XY: 727204
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
42
AN:
1461820
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
727204
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000328 AC: 5AN: 152304Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000537 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74454
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
152304
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74454
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Dec 28, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 23, 2015 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 17724471) - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2024 | BRCA2: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | BRCAlab, Lund University | Mar 02, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jun 29, 2017 | Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration (Splicing prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/). - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 28, 2015 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 18, 2017 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 03, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 22, 2019 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.10023C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.6e-05 in 250960 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.10023C>T has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories and one expert panel have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as likely benign. In addition, a reputable database indicates the variant to co-occur with a pathogenic BRCA1 variant, c.5152+5G>A (internally classified as pathogenic). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at