chr13-45544963-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 0P and 0B.
The NM_182542.3(ERICH6B):c.1669G>A(p.Gly557Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000496 in 1,550,884 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_182542.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_182542.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERICH6B | NM_182542.3 | MANE Select | c.1669G>A | p.Gly557Ser | missense | Exon 14 of 15 | NP_872348.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERICH6B | ENST00000298738.3 | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.1669G>A | p.Gly557Ser | missense | Exon 14 of 15 | ENSP00000298738.2 | Q5W0A0-1 | |
| ERICH6B | ENST00000482992.1 | TSL:3 | n.372G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 4 of 4 | ||||
| ERICH6B | ENST00000504261.5 | TSL:3 | n.263+4930G>A | intron | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000276 AC: 42AN: 152116Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000703 AC: 11AN: 156534 AF XY: 0.0000723 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000243 AC: 34AN: 1398650Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000261 AC XY: 18AN XY: 689852 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000282 AC: 43AN: 152234Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000269 AC XY: 20AN XY: 74448 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at