chr13-48001221-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_003850.3(SUCLA2):​c.49C>G​(p.Arg17Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000271 in 1,608,810 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00023 ( 0 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00028 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

SUCLA2
NM_003850.3 missense

Scores

1
3
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.263

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SUCLA2 (HGNC:11448): (succinate-CoA ligase ADP-forming subunit beta) Succinyl-CoA synthetase (SCS) is a mitochondrial matrix enzyme that acts as a heterodimer, being composed of an invariant alpha subunit and a substrate-specific beta subunit. The protein encoded by this gene is an ATP-specific SCS beta subunit that dimerizes with the SCS alpha subunit to form SCS-A, an essential component of the tricarboxylic acid cycle. SCS-A hydrolyzes ATP to convert succinate to succinyl-CoA. Defects in this gene are a cause of myopathic mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome. A pseudogene of this gene has been found on chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
SUCLA2-AS1 (HGNC:39965): (SUCLA2 antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.06358954).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.000275 (401/1456502) while in subpopulation MID AF = 0.00434 (25/5756). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00302. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 198 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_003850.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
SUCLA2
NM_003850.3
MANE Select
c.49C>Gp.Arg17Gly
missense
Exon 1 of 11NP_003841.1
SUCLA2-AS1
NR_189308.1
n.-184G>C
upstream_gene
N/A

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
SUCLA2
ENST00000646932.1
MANE Select
c.49C>Gp.Arg17Gly
missense
Exon 1 of 11ENSP00000494360.1
SUCLA2
ENST00000643023.1
c.49C>Gp.Arg17Gly
missense
Exon 1 of 12ENSP00000495664.1
SUCLA2
ENST00000434484.5
TSL:5
c.20C>Gp.Ser7Trp
missense
Exon 1 of 7ENSP00000392771.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000230
AC:
35
AN:
152190
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000279
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000321
AC:
76
AN:
236526
AF XY:
0.000318
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000698
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000150
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00308
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000348
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000520
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000275
AC:
401
AN:
1456502
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000273
AC XY:
198
AN XY:
724282
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000210
AC:
7
AN:
33406
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000181
AC:
8
AN:
44104
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00312
AC:
81
AN:
26000
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39468
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000234
AC:
2
AN:
85432
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
51806
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00434
AC:
25
AN:
5756
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000230
AC:
255
AN:
1110450
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000383
AC:
23
AN:
60080
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.481
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
23
46
69
92
115
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000230
AC:
35
AN:
152308
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000201
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
74464
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000241
AC:
1
AN:
41572
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
2
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00288
AC:
10
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5166
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000188
AC:
2
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000279
AC:
19
AN:
68026
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.484
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
6
8
11
14
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000537
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000295
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000228
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000350
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.000232
AC:
28

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:4
Jul 06, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 05, 2024
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 20843780)

Jul 30, 2024
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BS1

Jun 20, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome, encephalomyopathic form with methylmalonic aciduria Uncertain:3Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.

Nov 20, 2019
Baylor Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868].

Apr 15, 2024
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 15, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

SUCLA2-related disorder Benign:1
Apr 03, 2022
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.093
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.13
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.11
CADD
Benign
15
DANN
Benign
0.68
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.18
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.36
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.42
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.46
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.60
T
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.96
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.064
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.45
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.81
L
PhyloP100
0.26
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.60
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.080
N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.39
Sift
Benign
0.11
T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.029
D
Polyphen
0.95
P
Vest4
0.66
MVP
0.68
MPC
0.63
ClinPred
0.053
T
GERP RS
2.4
PromoterAI
-0.065
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0
Varity_R
0.16
gMVP
0.51
Mutation Taster
=86/14
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200124902; hg19: chr13-48575357; COSMIC: COSV66223216; COSMIC: COSV66223216; API