chr14-53046817-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting
The NM_001160148.2(DDHD1):āc.2654A>Gā(p.Tyr885Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000595 in 1,612,720 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.000060 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
DDHD1
NM_001160148.2 missense
NM_001160148.2 missense
Scores
6
10
3
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.76
Genes affected
DDHD1 (HGNC:19714): (DDHD domain containing 1) This gene is a member of the intracellular phospholipase A1 gene family. The protein encoded by this gene preferentially hydrolyzes phosphatidic acid. It is a cytosolic protein with some mitochondrial localization, and is thought to be involved in the regulation of mitochondrial dynamics. Overexpression of this gene causes fragmentation of the tubular structures in mitochondria, while depletion of the gene results in mitochondrial tubule elongation. Deletion of this gene in male mice caused fertility defects, resulting from disruption in the organization of the mitochondria during spermiogenesis. In humans, mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP), also known as Strumpell-Lorrain disease, or, familial spastic paraparesis (FSP). This inherited disorder is characterized by progressive weakness and spasticity of the legs. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.037331074).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000526 (8/152054) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00155 (8/5172). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000769. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 6 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDHD1 | NM_001160148.2 | c.2654A>G | p.Tyr885Cys | missense_variant | 13/13 | ENST00000673822.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDHD1 | ENST00000673822.2 | c.2654A>G | p.Tyr885Cys | missense_variant | 13/13 | NM_001160148.2 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000527 AC: 8AN: 151942Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
151942
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000184 AC: 46AN: 250190Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000170 AC XY: 23AN XY: 135296
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
46
AN:
250190
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
135296
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000602 AC: 88AN: 1460666Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000661 AC XY: 48AN XY: 726660
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
88
AN:
1460666
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
48
AN XY:
726660
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8AN: 152054Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000807 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74316
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
152054
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74316
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
AF:
AC:
19
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary spastic paraplegia 28 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jun 13, 2022 | This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with DDHD1-related conditions. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Probably Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). This variant is present in population databases (rs141960546, gnomAD 0.2%). This sequence change replaces tyrosine, which is neutral and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 864 of the DDHD1 protein (p.Tyr864Cys). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
.;.;D;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
.;.;M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
.;D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
.;D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
.;.;D;D
Vest4
MVP
MPC
1.5
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at