chr14-73173571-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 19 ACMG points: 19P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000021.4(PSEN1):c.344A>G(p.Tyr115Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Y115H) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000021.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSEN1 | NM_000021.4 | c.344A>G | p.Tyr115Cys | missense_variant | 5/12 | ENST00000324501.10 | NP_000012.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSEN1 | ENST00000324501.10 | c.344A>G | p.Tyr115Cys | missense_variant | 5/12 | 1 | NM_000021.4 | ENSP00000326366 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Alzheimer disease 3 Pathogenic:2
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 05, 2020 | Variant summary: PSEN1 c.344A>G (p.Tyr115Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 251468 control chromosomes (gnomAD). c.344A>G has been reported in the literature in multiple individuals and families affected with Alzheimer Disease (e.g. Cruts_1998, Ryan_2016, Lanoiselee_2017). These data indicate that the variant is very likely to be associated with disease. Publications reporting experimental evidence show the variant alters protein function, and results in major defects in lysosome function and autophagy in human neurons (Moore_2015, Hung_2018). Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, and both of them classified the variant as pathogenic. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as pathogenic. - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Johns Hopkins Genomics, Johns Hopkins University | May 21, 2020 | - - |
not provided Pathogenic:1Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | VIB Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Antwerp | - | - - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Nov 13, 2015 | - - |
Pick disease;C0338451:Frontotemporal dementia;C1843013:Alzheimer disease 3;C3151038:Acne inversa, familial, 3 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Sep 11, 2020 | This variant has been observed in individual(s) with early onset Alzheimer disease (PMID: 9384602, 27777022, 28350801). It has also been observed to segregate with disease in related individuals. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 98015). Experimental studies have shown that this variant affects PSEN1 protein function (PMID: 25921538). For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. This sequence change replaces tyrosine with cysteine at codon 115 of the PSEN1 protein (p.Tyr115Cys). The tyrosine residue is highly conserved and there is a large physicochemical difference between tyrosine and cysteine. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at