chr14-74239723-C-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_182894.3(VSX2):​c.162C>A​(p.Asp54Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000511 in 1,549,210 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0024 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00030 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

VSX2
NM_182894.3 missense

Scores

3
15

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.12
Variant links:
Genes affected
VSX2 (HGNC:1975): (visual system homeobox 2) This gene encodes a homeobox protein originally described as a retina-specific transcription factor. Mutations in this gene are associated with microphthalmia, cataracts and iris abnormalities. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0077951252).
BP6
Variant 14-74239723-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-74239723-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 468358.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00241 (367/152316) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00818 (340/41568). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00746. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 175 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
VSX2NM_182894.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.162C>A p.Asp54Glu missense_variant 1/5 ENST00000261980.3 NP_878314.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
VSX2ENST00000261980.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.162C>A p.Asp54Glu missense_variant 1/51 NM_182894.3 ENSP00000261980 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00241
AC:
367
AN:
152198
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00820
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000570
AC:
83
AN:
145736
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000432
AC XY:
34
AN XY:
78688
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00917
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000735
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000442
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000304
AC:
425
AN:
1396894
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000277
AC XY:
191
AN XY:
688882
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000729
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000631
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000111
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000864
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00241
AC:
367
AN:
152316
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00235
AC XY:
175
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00818
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00237
Alfa
AF:
0.000168
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00273
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00575
AC:
21
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000353
AC:
28
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Isolated microphthalmia 2 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Microphthalmia, isolated, with coloboma 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Microphthalmia Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
VSX2-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesSep 23, 2019This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.081
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.48
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.13
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.74
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.51
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.87
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.48
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0078
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.61
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.23
N
MutationTaster
Benign
0.86
D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.72
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.070
N
REVEL
Benign
0.22
Sift
Benign
0.66
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.68
T
Polyphen
0.0020
B
Vest4
0.14
MutPred
0.22
Gain of disorder (P = 0.0954);
MVP
0.88
MPC
0.21
ClinPred
0.0072
T
GERP RS
3.9
Varity_R
0.089
gMVP
0.30

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61747367; hg19: chr14-74706426; API