chr14-76371482-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2
The ENST00000505752.6(ESRRB):c.-236C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR, NMD transcript change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00423 in 152,334 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 20 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0042 ( 20 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
ESRRB
ENST00000505752.6 5_prime_UTR, NMD_transcript
ENST00000505752.6 5_prime_UTR, NMD_transcript
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.269
Genes affected
ESRRB (HGNC:3473): (estrogen related receptor beta) This gene encodes a protein with similarity to the estrogen receptor. Its function is unknown; however, a similar protein in mouse plays an essential role in placental development. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00423 (644/152334) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.04 (611/15294). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0373. There are 20 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 391 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 20 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESRRB | NM_004452.4 | c.-236C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/11 | |||
ESRRB | NM_001411038.1 | c.2+60566C>T | intron_variant | ||||
ESRRB | XM_047431079.1 | c.-67-36061C>T | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESRRB | ENST00000505752.6 | c.-236C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 1/12 | 1 | ||||
ESRRB | ENST00000380887.7 | c.-236C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/11 | 5 | ||||
ESRRB | ENST00000512784.6 | c.2+60566C>T | intron_variant | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00422 AC: 642AN: 152216Hom.: 19 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
642
AN:
152216
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 120Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 90
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
120
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
90
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00423 AC: 644AN: 152334Hom.: 20 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00525 AC XY: 391AN XY: 74480
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
644
AN:
152334
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
391
AN XY:
74480
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 35 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at