chr14-95086682-T-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_177438.3(DICER1):c.*3816A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000159 in 233,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000099 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00027 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

DICER1
NM_177438.3 3_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.65

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

DICER1 (HGNC:17098): (dicer 1, ribonuclease III) This gene encodes a protein possessing an RNA helicase motif containing a DEXH box in its amino terminus and an RNA motif in the carboxy terminus. The encoded protein functions as a ribonuclease and is required by the RNA interference and small temporal RNA (stRNA) pathways to produce the active small RNA component that represses gene expression. This protein also acts as a strong antiviral agent with activity against RNA viruses, including the Zika and SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2021]

DICER1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

DICER1-related tumor predisposition
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
pleuropulmonary blastoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
DICER1 syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
global developmental delay - lung cysts - overgrowth - Wilms tumor syndrome
Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

DICER1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000985 (15/152216) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.000176 (12/68038). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000102. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 7 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 15 AD,Unknown gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DICER1	NM_177438.3 link	c.*3816A>G		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 27 of 27	ENST00000343455.8	NP_803187.1	Q9UPY3-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DICER1	ENST00000343455.8 link	c.*3816A>G		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 27 of 27	1	NM_177438.3	ENSP00000343745.3		Q9UPY3-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000985

AC:

AN:

152216

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000176

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000272

AC:

AN:

80910

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000322

AC XY:

AN XY:

37252

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3878

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2492

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5106

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

11266

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

694

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

424

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

488

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000401

AC:

AN:

49816

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000296

AC:

AN:

6746

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000985

AC:

AN:

152216

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000941

AC XY:

AN XY:

74368

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000724

AC:

AN:

41454

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15282

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5200

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000176

AC:

AN:

68038

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.505

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000139

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000117

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

DICER1-related tumor predisposition

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.62

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.74

PhyloP100

1.6

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over