chr15-34793398-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 14 ACMG points: 18P and 4B. PS3PM1PP3_StrongPP5_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_005159.5(ACTC1):c.301G>A(p.Glu101Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000434 in 1,613,988 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 13/23 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). ClinVar reports functional evidence for this variant: "SCV005416396: "Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product."; SCV000207710: Published functional studies demonstrate a damaging effect resulting in a decrease in sarcomeric force generation (Bookwater et al., 2006; Monserrat et al., 2007; Chow et al., 2014); SCV000260669: Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects ACTC1 function (PMID:16611632, 19799913, 21622575).; SCV000061995: "In vitro studies indicate that this variant leads to reduced affinity of myosin for actin and results in decreased force generation (Bookwalter 2006, Debold 2010, Chow 2014). Furthermore, a mouse model harboring this variant presented with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and had a decreased lifespan (Song 2011)."; SCV005629072: "In the crystal structure of the actin monomer, this substitution is located on the surface of Sub-domain 1. The charge reversal caused by Glu101Lys substitution could destabilize the N-terminal domain of the ACTC1. Alternatively, the charge reversal could affect ACTC1 interactions with partner proteins."; SCV002754279: Functional studies have reported this mutation to result in slower motility, reduced average force, and a weakened interaction with cardiac myosin in the presence of ATP (Bookwalter CS et al. J. Biol. Chem., 2006 Jun;281:16777-84). In addition, transgenic mice expressing p.E101K were reported to have similar features of HCM as those seen in patients with this mutation (Song W et al. J. Biol. Chem., 2011 Aug;286:27582-93).". Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E101G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005159.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 14 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005159.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTC1 | MANE Select | c.301G>A | p.Glu101Lys | missense | Exon 3 of 7 | NP_005150.1 | P68032 | ||
| ACTC1 | c.301G>A | p.Glu101Lys | missense | Exon 2 of 6 | NP_001393411.1 | P68032 | |||
| ACTC1 | c.301G>A | p.Glu101Lys | missense | Exon 3 of 7 | NP_001393412.1 | P68032 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTC1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.301G>A | p.Glu101Lys | missense | Exon 3 of 7 | ENSP00000290378.4 | P68032 | ||
| ACTC1 | c.412G>A | p.Glu138Lys | missense | Exon 4 of 8 | ENSP00000518909.1 | A0AAQ5BGG2 | |||
| ACTC1 | c.301G>A | p.Glu101Lys | missense | Exon 3 of 7 | ENSP00000538467.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152098Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251492 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000410 AC: 6AN: 1461890Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000550 AC XY: 4AN XY: 727244 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152098Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74290 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at