chr15-38252985-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_152594.3(SPRED1):​c.-201G>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000759 in 605,082 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00061 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00081 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SPRED1
NM_152594.3 5_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.657

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SPRED1 (HGNC:20249): (sprouty related EVH1 domain containing 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the Sprouty family of proteins and is phosphorylated by tyrosine kinase in response to several growth factors. The encoded protein can act as a homodimer or as a heterodimer with SPRED2 to regulate activation of the MAP kinase cascade. Defects in this gene are a cause of neurofibromatosis type 1-like syndrome (NFLS). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
SPRED1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Legius syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000611 (93/152152) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00113 (77/67978). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000929. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 35 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 93 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SPRED1NM_152594.3 linkc.-201G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 7 ENST00000299084.9 NP_689807.1 Q7Z699
SPRED1XM_005254202.4 linkc.-201G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 8 XP_005254259.1
SPRED1XM_047432199.1 linkc.-364G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 9 XP_047288155.1
SPRED1XM_047432200.1 linkc.-328G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 8 XP_047288156.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SPRED1ENST00000299084.9 linkc.-201G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 7 1 NM_152594.3 ENSP00000299084.4 Q7Z699
SPRED1ENST00000561205.1 linkn.138G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 1 of 5 5
ENSG00000310144ENST00000847565.1 linkn.95+582C>T intron_variant Intron 1 of 1
SPRED1ENST00000561317.1 linkc.-328G>A upstream_gene_variant 4 ENSP00000453680.1 H0YMN8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000612
AC:
93
AN:
152034
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000217
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000622
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000957
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000808
AC:
366
AN:
452930
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
3
AF XY:
0.000771
AC XY:
186
AN XY:
241090
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000163
AC:
2
AN:
12272
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000422
AC:
8
AN:
18956
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000587
AC:
8
AN:
13634
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
30996
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000601
AC:
28
AN:
46582
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000239
AC:
7
AN:
29238
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
1970
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00110
AC:
300
AN:
273306
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000500
AC:
13
AN:
25976
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
18
36
54
72
90
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000611
AC:
93
AN:
152152
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000471
AC XY:
35
AN XY:
74368
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000217
AC:
9
AN:
41532
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
2
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5132
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000623
AC:
3
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10602
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00113
AC:
77
AN:
67978
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000947
AC:
2
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.493
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
5
10
14
19
24
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00106
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000672

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Legius syndrome Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.59
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Benign
0.95
PhyloP100
0.66
PromoterAI
-0.019
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.3

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs770231868; hg19: chr15-38545186; API