chr15-40980293-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2_Supporting
The NM_017553.3(INO80):c.4601C>T(p.Thr1534Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00013 in 1,613,836 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00013 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
INO80
NM_017553.3 missense
NM_017553.3 missense
Scores
9
10
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.28
Genes affected
INO80 (HGNC:26956): (INO80 complex ATPase subunit) This gene encodes a subunit of the chromatin remodeling complex, which is classified into subfamilies depending on sequence features apart from the conserved ATPase domain. This protein is the catalytic ATPase subunit of the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex, which is characterized by a DNA-binding domain. This protein is proposed to bind DNA and be recruited by the YY1 transcription factor to activate certain genes. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.022941679).
BP6
Variant 15-40980293-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-40980293-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 3057313.Status of the report is no_assertion_criteria_provided, 0 stars.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 22 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INO80 | NM_017553.3 | c.4601C>T | p.Thr1534Ile | missense_variant | 36/36 | ENST00000648947.1 | NP_060023.1 | |
INO80 | XM_047432698.1 | c.4601C>T | p.Thr1534Ile | missense_variant | 36/36 | XP_047288654.1 | ||
INO80 | XM_011521686.4 | c.2651C>T | p.Thr884Ile | missense_variant | 22/22 | XP_011519988.1 | ||
INO80 | NR_104038.2 | n.4824C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 35/35 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000145 AC: 22AN: 152198Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
22
AN:
152198
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000282 AC: 71AN: 251494Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000397 AC XY: 54AN XY: 135922
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
71
AN:
251494
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
54
AN XY:
135922
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000128 AC: 187AN: 1461520Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000206 AC XY: 150AN XY: 727046
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
187
AN:
1461520
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
150
AN XY:
727046
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000144 AC: 22AN: 152316Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000188 AC XY: 14AN XY: 74488
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
22
AN:
152316
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
74488
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
AF:
AC:
31
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: no assertion criteria provided
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
INO80-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 21, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T;T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
.;.;T
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
.;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
.;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
.;T;T
Polyphen
P;P;P
Vest4
0.43, 0.45
MutPred
Loss of loop (P = 0.0235);Loss of loop (P = 0.0235);Loss of loop (P = 0.0235);
MVP
0.35
MPC
0.53
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at