chr15-42945377-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 3P and 9B. PM2PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_174916.3(UBR1):ā€‹c.5202C>Gā€‹(p.Ser1734Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000208 in 1,614,052 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00089 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00014 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

UBR1
NM_174916.3 missense

Scores

5
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.71
Variant links:
Genes affected
UBR1 (HGNC:16808): (ubiquitin protein ligase E3 component n-recognin 1) The N-end rule pathway is one proteolytic pathway of the ubiquitin system. The recognition component of this pathway, encoded by this gene, binds to a destabilizing N-terminal residue of a substrate protein and participates in the formation of a substrate-linked multiubiquitin chain. This leads to the eventual degradation of the substrate protein. The protein described in this record has a RING-type zinc finger and a UBR-type zinc finger. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Johanson-Blizzard syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), UBR1. . Gene score misZ 2.3964 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 3.2935 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with Johanson-Blizzard syndrome.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.018465787).
BP6
Variant 15-42945377-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-42945377-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 1533596.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000894 (136/152178) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00296 (123/41514). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00254. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 54 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
UBR1NM_174916.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.5202C>G p.Ser1734Arg missense_variant 47/47 ENST00000290650.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
UBR1ENST00000290650.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.5202C>G p.Ser1734Arg missense_variant 47/471 NM_174916.3 P1Q8IWV7-1
UBR1ENST00000562173.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.407C>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 2/23

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000901
AC:
137
AN:
152060
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00300
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000525
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000959
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000255
AC:
64
AN:
251448
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000228
AC XY:
31
AN XY:
135906
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00332
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000136
AC:
199
AN:
1461874
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000116
AC XY:
84
AN XY:
727238
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00287
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000201
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000656
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000315
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000894
AC:
136
AN:
152178
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000726
AC XY:
54
AN XY:
74398
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00296
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000524
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000949
Alfa
AF:
0.000263
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00102
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00182
AC:
8
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.000346
AC:
42
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000273
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 15, 2023In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJan 08, 2024This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
UBR1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 22, 2022This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.51
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.28
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.18
CADD
Benign
23
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.13
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.33
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.12
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.94
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.019
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.018
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.26
N
MutationTaster
Benign
0.99
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.71
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.8
N
REVEL
Benign
0.17
Sift
Benign
0.061
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.37
T
Polyphen
0.076
B
Vest4
0.60
MutPred
0.30
Loss of helix (P = 0.0237);
MVP
0.52
MPC
0.22
ClinPred
0.024
T
GERP RS
3.3
Varity_R
0.35
gMVP
0.63

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs139367236; hg19: chr15-43237575; API