chr15-43600608-A-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_Moderate
The NM_153700.2(STRC):āc.4919T>Gā(p.Leu1640Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000342 in 1,461,712 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L1640F) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_153700.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRC | NM_153700.2 | c.4919T>G | p.Leu1640Arg | missense_variant | 26/29 | ENST00000450892.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRC | ENST00000450892.7 | c.4919T>G | p.Leu1640Arg | missense_variant | 26/29 | 5 | NM_153700.2 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 26
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000342 AC: 5AN: 1461712Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000550 AC XY: 4AN XY: 727156
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 26
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Oct 06, 2013 | Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Pathogenic. The Leu1640Arg variant in STRC has not been reported in individuals with hearing loss or in lar ge population studies. Computational analyses (biochemical amino acid properties , conservation, AlignGVGD, PolyPhen2, and SIFT) suggest that the Leu1640Arg vari ant may impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to determine pathogenicity. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant c annot be determined with certainty; however due to the fact that it was identifi ed in an individual with hearing loss (this patient) who also carries a pathogen ic STRC variant on the other allele, we would lean towards a more likely pathog enic role. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at