chr15-43600609-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_153700.2(STRC):c.4918C>T(p.Leu1640Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00184 in 1,606,082 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 29 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L1640R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_153700.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRC | NM_153700.2 | c.4918C>T | p.Leu1640Phe | missense_variant | 26/29 | ENST00000450892.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRC | ENST00000450892.7 | c.4918C>T | p.Leu1640Phe | missense_variant | 26/29 | 5 | NM_153700.2 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00175 AC: 265AN: 151408Hom.: 0 Cov.: 26
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00118 AC: 296AN: 251078Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00119 AC XY: 162AN XY: 135708
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00185 AC: 2686AN: 1454554Hom.: 29 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00180 AC XY: 1300AN XY: 723052
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00174 AC: 264AN: 151528Hom.: 0 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.00148 AC XY: 110AN XY: 74084
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jan 01, 2024 | STRC: BS2 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 04, 2017 | The p.Leu1640Phe variant (rs727503441) has previously been associated with congenital moderate hearing loss in several patients who also carried heterozygous deletions of STRC (Mandelker 2014 and Vona 2015). It has also been reported to ClinVar with the classification of uncertain significance. The c.4917_4918delinsCT variant is listed in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) browser as two separate variants, c.4917A>C and c.4918C>T (rs2860666 and rs2920791), but viewable data on the gnomAD website indicate that both variants are inherited together and have an overall population frequency of 0.118 percent (identified on 289 out of 245,896 chromosomes, including 5 homozygotes). Individuals with hearing loss are not explicitly excluded from the gnomAD data set; therefore, the hearing ability of the 5 homozygous individuals in gnomAD is unknown. The leucine at position 1640 is moderately conserved (considering 11 species) (Alamut v.2.8.1) and computational analyses predict conflicting effects of this variant on protein structure/function (SIFT: tolerated, MutationTaster: disease causing, PolyPhen-2: possibly damaging). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jun 27, 2019 | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 16 Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Division of Human Genetics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Apr 07, 2015 | - - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | research | King Laboratory, University of Washington | Feb 28, 2023 | This variant occurred in homozygosity in a patient with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss of onset <18 years, in a study of pediatric hearing loss conducted by the King Laboratory (Carlson RJ et al. JAMA-OtoHNS 2023). This patient was born to consanguineous parents and their family has no other history of hearing loss. This variant is a missense at a highly conserved site and is predicted to be damaging by multiple in-silico tools. As of January 2023, this variant has been reported to ClinVar with conflicting interpretations and is found in 331 heterozygotes and 5 homozygotes on gnomAD. Based on homozygosity, consistently predicted functional effect, and goodness of fit of genotype to phenotype, we conclude that this variant is likely pathogenic. - |
STRC-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Aug 15, 2024 | The STRC c.4918C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Leu1640Phe. This variant has been reported in three patients with hearing loss in trans to a STRC full gene deletion, and was confirmed using an assay that excludes the STRCP1 pseudogene in two of these patients (Vona et al. 2015. PubMed ID: 26011646; described as c.4917_4918delinsCT, Mandelker et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 25157971; Table S2, Shearer et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 24963352). This variant is reported in 0.20% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD, including five homozygotes with unknown hearing status (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/15-43892807-G-A). However, NGS based population database allele frequencies may not be accurate at this locus due to paralogy. Additionally, at PreventionGenetics and using an assay that excludes the STRCP1 pseudogene, we have observed this variant in the hemizygous state in trans to a STRC deletion in a patient with hearing loss as well as in the homozygous state in three patients undergoing testing unrelated to hearing loss. This variant is listed in ClinVar with conflicting interpretations of uncertain and likely benign (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/417924/). Although we suspect this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at