chr15-43604408-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 3P and 2B. PM5PP5BP4BS2_Supporting
The NM_153700.2(STRC):c.4171C>G(p.Arg1391Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000756 in 1,587,048 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1391C) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_153700.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_153700.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STRC | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.4171C>G | p.Arg1391Gly | missense | Exon 21 of 29 | ENSP00000401513.2 | Q7RTU9 | ||
| STRC | TSL:1 | n.*1963C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 20 of 28 | ENSP00000394866.1 | E7EPM8 | |||
| STRC | TSL:1 | n.*1963C>G | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 20 of 28 | ENSP00000394866.1 | E7EPM8 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 151698Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000129 AC: 25AN: 193244 AF XY: 0.0000867 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000725 AC: 104AN: 1435350Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000688 AC XY: 49AN XY: 711740 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 151698Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000122 AC XY: 9AN XY: 74054 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at