chr15-49424373-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP3
The NM_002009.4(FGF7):c.76G>T(p.Gly26Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,496 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002009.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGF7 | NM_002009.4 | c.76G>T | p.Gly26Cys | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 4 | ENST00000267843.9 | NP_002000.1 | |
FAM227B | NM_152647.3 | c.1013-52974C>A | intron_variant | Intron 11 of 15 | ENST00000299338.11 | NP_689860.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGF7 | ENST00000267843.9 | c.76G>T | p.Gly26Cys | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 4 | 1 | NM_002009.4 | ENSP00000267843.4 | ||
FAM227B | ENST00000299338.11 | c.1013-52974C>A | intron_variant | Intron 11 of 15 | 2 | NM_152647.3 | ENSP00000299338.6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461496Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727044 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.76G>T (p.G26C) alteration is located in exon 2 (coding exon 1) of the FGF7 gene. This alteration results from a G to T substitution at nucleotide position 76, causing the glycine (G) at amino acid position 26 to be replaced by a cysteine (C). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at