chr15-55355393-G-C
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBP7BS1
The NM_004855.5(PIGB):c.1626G>C(p.Arg542Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000092 in 1,609,252 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000094 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
PIGB
NM_004855.5 synonymous
NM_004855.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.660
Publications
0 publications found
Genes affected
PIGB (HGNC:8959): (phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class B) This gene encodes a transmembrane protein that is located in the endoplasmic reticulum and is involved in GPI-anchor biosynthesis. The glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor is a glycolipid found on many blood cells and serves to anchor proteins to the cell surface. This gene is thought to encode a member of a family of dolichol-phosphate-mannose (Dol-P-Man) dependent mannosyltransferases. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
CCPG1 (HGNC:24227): (cell cycle progression 1) Involved in positive regulation of cell cycle and positive regulation of cell population proliferation. Predicted to be integral component of membrane. Predicted to be active in membrane. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
DNAAF4-CCPG1 (HGNC:43019): (DNAAF4-CCPG1 readthrough (NMD candidate)) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring dyslexia susceptibility 1 candidate 1 (DYX1C1) and cell cycle progression 1 (CCPG1) genes on chromosome 15. The read-through transcript is a candidate for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), and is thus unlikely to produce a protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).
BP6
Variant 15-55355393-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-55355393-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 1586179.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.66 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000722 (11/152288) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00228 (11/4830). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00128. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 9 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIGB | ENST00000164305.10 | c.1626G>C | p.Arg542Arg | synonymous_variant | Exon 12 of 12 | 1 | NM_004855.5 | ENSP00000164305.5 | ||
CCPG1 | ENST00000442196.8 | c.*827C>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 9 of 9 | 2 | NM_001204450.2 | ENSP00000403400.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
152170
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000214 AC: 52AN: 243398 AF XY: 0.000303 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
AC:
52
AN:
243398
AF XY:
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000940 AC: 137AN: 1456964Hom.: 1 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.000145 AC XY: 105AN XY: 724678 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
137
AN:
1456964
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
AC XY:
105
AN XY:
724678
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
33288
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
43896
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
26008
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
39538
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
131
AN:
85246
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
53334
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
1109716
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
60176
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.479
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6
11
17
22
28
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000722 AC: 11AN: 152288Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000121 AC XY: 9AN XY: 74454 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
152288
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
74454
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
41546
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
68036
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.566
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
2
3
4
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Oct 25, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.