chr15-73323262-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The ENST00000261917.4(HCN4):c.2831C>T(p.Ala944Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000769 in 1,525,396 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A944T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000261917.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCN4 | NM_005477.3 | c.2831C>T | p.Ala944Val | missense_variant | 8/8 | ENST00000261917.4 | NP_005468.1 | |
HCN4 | XM_011521148.3 | c.1613C>T | p.Ala538Val | missense_variant | 7/7 | XP_011519450.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCN4 | ENST00000261917.4 | c.2831C>T | p.Ala944Val | missense_variant | 8/8 | 1 | NM_005477.3 | ENSP00000261917 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00375 AC: 570AN: 152150Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00121 AC: 168AN: 138888Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00104 AC XY: 77AN XY: 73938
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000436 AC: 599AN: 1373128Hom.: 4 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.000381 AC XY: 256AN XY: 672768
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00377 AC: 574AN: 152268Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00367 AC XY: 273AN XY: 74470
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 02, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 02, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Nov 20, 2017 | - - |
Brugada syndrome 8 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 25, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 17, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at