chr15-73325352-G-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_005477.3(HCN4):c.1683C>A(p.Gly561=) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00175 in 1,613,812 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 41 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0096 ( 23 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00092 ( 18 hom. )
Consequence
HCN4
NM_005477.3 synonymous
NM_005477.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.74
Genes affected
HCN4 (HGNC:16882): (hyperpolarization activated cyclic nucleotide gated potassium channel 4) This gene encodes a member of the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated potassium channels. The encoded protein shows slow kinetics of activation and inactivation, and is necessary for the cardiac pacemaking process. This channel may also mediate responses to sour stimuli. Mutations in this gene have been linked to sick sinus syndrome 2, also known as atrial fibrillation with bradyarrhythmia or familial sinus bradycardia. Two pseudogenes have been identified on chromosome 15. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
Variant 15-73325352-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-73325352-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 190769.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-73325352-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00963 (1467/152296) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0333 (1385/41560). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0319. There are 23 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 692 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1467 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCN4 | NM_005477.3 | c.1683C>A | p.Gly561= | synonymous_variant | 5/8 | ENST00000261917.4 | |
HCN4 | XM_011521148.3 | c.465C>A | p.Gly155= | synonymous_variant | 4/7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCN4 | ENST00000261917.4 | c.1683C>A | p.Gly561= | synonymous_variant | 5/8 | 1 | NM_005477.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00962 AC: 1464AN: 152178Hom.: 23 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1464
AN:
152178
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00236 AC: 592AN: 251284Hom.: 8 AF XY: 0.00158 AC XY: 215AN XY: 135810
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
592
AN:
251284
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
215
AN XY:
135810
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000924 AC: 1351AN: 1461516Hom.: 18 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000795 AC XY: 578AN XY: 727054
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1351
AN:
1461516
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
578
AN XY:
727054
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00963 AC: 1467AN: 152296Hom.: 23 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00929 AC XY: 692AN XY: 74476
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1467
AN:
152296
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
692
AN XY:
74476
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 08, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 18, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 01, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Sick sinus syndrome 2, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Brugada syndrome 8 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 07, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at