chr15-75356838-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 1P and 2B. PP5BP4BS2_Supporting
The NM_006715.4(MAN2C1):āc.2612G>Cā(p.Cys871Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000863 in 1,614,004 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006715.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAN2C1 | NM_006715.4 | c.2612G>C | p.Cys871Ser | missense_variant | 22/26 | ENST00000267978.10 | NP_006706.2 | |
NEIL1 | NM_024608.4 | c.*1804C>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 10/10 | ENST00000355059.9 | NP_078884.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAN2C1 | ENST00000267978.10 | c.2612G>C | p.Cys871Ser | missense_variant | 22/26 | 1 | NM_006715.4 | ENSP00000267978.4 | ||
NEIL1 | ENST00000355059.9 | c.*1804C>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 10/10 | 2 | NM_024608.4 | ENSP00000347170.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000440 AC: 67AN: 152242Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000473 AC: 119AN: 251328Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000420 AC XY: 57AN XY: 135872
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000907 AC: 1326AN: 1461762Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000866 AC XY: 630AN XY: 727192
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000440 AC: 67AN: 152242Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000376 AC XY: 28AN XY: 74384
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Congenital disorder of deglycosylation 2 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Mar 09, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at