chr15-89323462-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The ENST00000268124.11(POLG):c.2207A>G(p.Asn736Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000427 in 1,614,046 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. N736N) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000268124.11 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLG | NM_002693.3 | c.2207A>G | p.Asn736Ser | missense_variant | 13/23 | ENST00000268124.11 | NP_002684.1 | |
POLGARF | NM_001406557.1 | c.*1479A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 13/23 | NP_001393486.1 | |||
POLG | NM_001126131.2 | c.2207A>G | p.Asn736Ser | missense_variant | 13/23 | NP_001119603.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLG | ENST00000268124.11 | c.2207A>G | p.Asn736Ser | missense_variant | 13/23 | 1 | NM_002693.3 | ENSP00000268124 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000854 AC: 130AN: 152148Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000322 AC: 81AN: 251376Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000287 AC XY: 39AN XY: 135882
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000383 AC: 560AN: 1461780Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000366 AC XY: 266AN XY: 727196
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000854 AC: 130AN: 152266Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000846 AC XY: 63AN XY: 74460
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:6Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 09, 2021 | Reported in a female patient with recurrent major depression, ataxia, and cardiomyopathy (Verhoeven et al., 2011); however, the variant was found more frequent in population databases than would be expected based on the frequency of disease, calling into question the pathogenicity of this variant (Andreasen et al., 2013); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23299917, 21654874, 21880868, 31996268) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 27, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Sep 01, 2023 | Available data are insufficient to determine the clinical significance of the variant at this time. The frequency of this variant in the general population is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). In multiple individuals, this variant has been seen where an alternate explanation for disease was also identified, suggesting this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Computational tools disagree on the variant's effect on normal protein function. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2022 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Jan 24, 2024 | BS2 - |
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 01, 2024 | Variant summary: POLG c.2207A>G (p.Asn736Ser) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00032 in 251376 control chromosomes, including 1 homozygote (gnomAD). c.2207A>G has been reported in the literature in heterozygous individuals affected with Progressive external ophthalmoplegia (Bychkov_2021), and depression, ataxia and cardiomyopathy (Verhoeven_2011). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with POLG-Related Spectrum Disorders. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 33486010, 21654874). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 206516). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Apr 21, 2014 | - - |
Progressive sclerosing poliodystrophy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Wong Mito Lab, Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine | Oct 01, 2018 | The NM_002693.2:c.2207A>G (NP_002684.1:p.Asn736Ser) [GRCH38: NC_000015.10:g.89323462T>C] variant in POLG gene is interpretated to be a Benign based on ACMG guidelines (PMID: 25741868). This variant meets the following evidence codes reported in the ACMG-guideline. BS1:The minor allele frequency of this allele is high for Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 4A (Alpers type). BS2:Observation of the variant in controls is inconsistent with penetrance of Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 4A (Alpers type). BP4:Computational evidence/predictors indicate no impact on the POLG structure, function, or protein-protein interaction. Based on the evidence criteria codes applied, the variant is suggested to be Benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 19, 2024 | - - |
Tip-toe gait Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, flagged submission | clinical testing | Practice for Gait Abnormalities, David Pomarino, Competency Network Toe Walking c/o Practice Pomarino | - | Hereditary motor sensory neuropathy (HMSN), also known as Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease (CMT), is the most commonly inherited peripheral polyneuropathy. It constitutes a group of inherited, progressive, motor and sensory peripheral nerve disorders with properties of demyelination, axonal degeneration, or both. It is classified by clinical characteristics, modes of inheritance, electrophysiologic features, metabolic defects, and specific gene markers. Our patients all walk on tiptoe, so they show similar symptoms. When we genetically test them with our toe walking panel, we find that around 90 per cent of them have a genetic variant that explains their toe walking. These can be assigned, for example, to the area of myopathies (such as variants of the COL6A3 gene), the area of hereditary neuropathies (such as variants of the KMT2C gene) or the area of metabolic diseases (such as variants of the PYGM gene). In a smaller group of patients with almost identical symptoms, no abnormality is found in the genes of our panel, but spastic paraplegia can be detected. In another small group of our toe walkers, no abnormalities can be detected in the genes analysed in our toe walking panel, nor do they suffer from spastic paraplegia, as is also the case with healthy children. In contrast to these, however, they show a tiptoe gait. These patients suffer from infantile cerebral palsy, in which toe walking can also be observed. - |
Progressive sclerosing poliodystrophy;C1834846:Progressive external ophthalmoplegia with mitochondrial DNA deletions, autosomal dominant 1;C1843851:Sensory ataxic neuropathy, dysarthria, and ophthalmoparesis;C3150914:Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 4b;C4225153:Progressive external ophthalmoplegia with mitochondrial DNA deletions, autosomal recessive 1;C4551995:Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | May 23, 2017 | - - |
POLG-Related Spectrum Disorders Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 27, 2023 | Unlikely to be causative of autosomal dominant progressive external ophthalmoplegia (AD) Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Intellectual disability Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Centre de Biologie Pathologie Génétique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille | Jan 01, 2019 | - - |
POLG-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 12, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at