chr15-89323462-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2

The ENST00000268124.11(POLG):​c.2207A>G​(p.Asn736Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000427 in 1,614,046 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. N736N) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00085 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00038 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

POLG
ENST00000268124.11 missense

Scores

1
6
12

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:12B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.97
Variant links:
Genes affected
POLG (HGNC:9179): (DNA polymerase gamma, catalytic subunit) Mitochondrial DNA polymerase is heterotrimeric, consisting of a homodimer of accessory subunits plus a catalytic subunit. The protein encoded by this gene is the catalytic subunit of mitochondrial DNA polymerase. The encoded protein contains a polyglutamine tract near its N-terminus that may be polymorphic. Defects in this gene are a cause of progressive external ophthalmoplegia with mitochondrial DNA deletions 1 (PEOA1), sensory ataxic neuropathy dysarthria and ophthalmoparesis (SANDO), Alpers-Huttenlocher syndrome (AHS), and mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalopathy syndrome (MNGIE). Two transcript variants encoding the same protein have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.020939589).
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
POLGNM_002693.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2207A>G p.Asn736Ser missense_variant 13/23 ENST00000268124.11 NP_002684.1
POLGARFNM_001406557.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.*1479A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant 13/23 NP_001393486.1
POLGNM_001126131.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2207A>G p.Asn736Ser missense_variant 13/23 NP_001119603.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
POLGENST00000268124.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.2207A>G p.Asn736Ser missense_variant 13/231 NM_002693.3 ENSP00000268124 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000854
AC:
130
AN:
152148
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00109
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0450
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000470
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000957
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000322
AC:
81
AN:
251376
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000287
AC XY:
39
AN XY:
135882
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00117
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000173
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000980
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000413
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000815
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000383
AC:
560
AN:
1461780
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000366
AC XY:
266
AN XY:
727196
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00114
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000179
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000104
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000374
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000432
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000381
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000854
AC:
130
AN:
152266
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000846
AC XY:
63
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00108
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000471
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000947
Alfa
AF:
0.000463
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00104
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000809
AC:
3
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00114
AC:
5
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000233
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
0.000354
AC:
43
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.000533

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:12Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:6Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 09, 2021Reported in a female patient with recurrent major depression, ataxia, and cardiomyopathy (Verhoeven et al., 2011); however, the variant was found more frequent in population databases than would be expected based on the frequency of disease, calling into question the pathogenicity of this variant (Andreasen et al., 2013); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23299917, 21654874, 21880868, 31996268) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Apr 27, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsSep 01, 2023Available data are insufficient to determine the clinical significance of the variant at this time. The frequency of this variant in the general population is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). In multiple individuals, this variant has been seen where an alternate explanation for disease was also identified, suggesting this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Computational tools disagree on the variant's effect on normal protein function. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenSep 01, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicJan 24, 2024BS2 -
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 01, 2024Variant summary: POLG c.2207A>G (p.Asn736Ser) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00032 in 251376 control chromosomes, including 1 homozygote (gnomAD). c.2207A>G has been reported in the literature in heterozygous individuals affected with Progressive external ophthalmoplegia (Bychkov_2021), and depression, ataxia and cardiomyopathy (Verhoeven_2011). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with POLG-Related Spectrum Disorders. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 33486010, 21654874). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 206516). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoApr 21, 2014- -
Progressive sclerosing poliodystrophy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWong Mito Lab, Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of MedicineOct 01, 2018The NM_002693.2:c.2207A>G (NP_002684.1:p.Asn736Ser) [GRCH38: NC_000015.10:g.89323462T>C] variant in POLG gene is interpretated to be a Benign based on ACMG guidelines (PMID: 25741868). This variant meets the following evidence codes reported in the ACMG-guideline. BS1:The minor allele frequency of this allele is high for Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 4A (Alpers type). BS2:Observation of the variant in controls is inconsistent with penetrance of Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 4A (Alpers type). BP4:Computational evidence/predictors indicate no impact on the POLG structure, function, or protein-protein interaction. Based on the evidence criteria codes applied, the variant is suggested to be Benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 19, 2024- -
Tip-toe gait Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, flagged submissionclinical testingPractice for Gait Abnormalities, David Pomarino, Competency Network Toe Walking c/o Practice Pomarino-Hereditary motor sensory neuropathy (HMSN), also known as Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease (CMT), is the most commonly inherited peripheral polyneuropathy. It constitutes a group of inherited, progressive, motor and sensory peripheral nerve disorders with properties of demyelination, axonal degeneration, or both. It is classified by clinical characteristics, modes of inheritance, electrophysiologic features, metabolic defects, and specific gene markers. Our patients all walk on tiptoe, so they show similar symptoms. When we genetically test them with our toe walking panel, we find that around 90 per cent of them have a genetic variant that explains their toe walking. These can be assigned, for example, to the area of myopathies (such as variants of the COL6A3 gene), the area of hereditary neuropathies (such as variants of the KMT2C gene) or the area of metabolic diseases (such as variants of the PYGM gene). In a smaller group of patients with almost identical symptoms, no abnormality is found in the genes of our panel, but spastic paraplegia can be detected. In another small group of our toe walkers, no abnormalities can be detected in the genes analysed in our toe walking panel, nor do they suffer from spastic paraplegia, as is also the case with healthy children. In contrast to these, however, they show a tiptoe gait. These patients suffer from infantile cerebral palsy, in which toe walking can also be observed. -
Progressive sclerosing poliodystrophy;C1834846:Progressive external ophthalmoplegia with mitochondrial DNA deletions, autosomal dominant 1;C1843851:Sensory ataxic neuropathy, dysarthria, and ophthalmoparesis;C3150914:Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 4b;C4225153:Progressive external ophthalmoplegia with mitochondrial DNA deletions, autosomal recessive 1;C4551995:Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMay 23, 2017- -
POLG-Related Spectrum Disorders Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 28, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 27, 2023Unlikely to be causative of autosomal dominant progressive external ophthalmoplegia (AD) Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Intellectual disability Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingCentre de Biologie Pathologie Génétique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de LilleJan 01, 2019- -
POLG-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 12, 2022This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.13
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.23
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.16
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.28
T;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.20
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.22
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.97
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
.;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.044
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.021
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.72
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.50
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.72
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.48
Sift
Benign
0.77
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T
Polyphen
1.0
D;D
Vest4
0.59
MVP
0.92
MPC
0.18
ClinPred
0.030
T
GERP RS
3.2
Varity_R
0.083
gMVP
0.55

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs138457939; hg19: chr15-89866693; API