chr15-90935356-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting
The NM_018671.5(UNC45A):c.32C>T(p.Pro11Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000948 in 1,603,838 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P11S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018671.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_018671.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNC45A | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.32C>T | p.Pro11Leu | missense | Exon 1 of 20 | ENSP00000407487.2 | Q9H3U1-1 | ||
| UNC45A | c.32C>T | p.Pro11Leu | missense | Exon 1 of 21 | ENSP00000606200.1 | ||||
| UNC45A | c.32C>T | p.Pro11Leu | missense | Exon 1 of 20 | ENSP00000565457.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000447 AC: 68AN: 152076Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000131 AC: 29AN: 221636 AF XY: 0.000106 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000579 AC: 84AN: 1451644Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000485 AC XY: 35AN XY: 721576 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000447 AC: 68AN: 152194Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000470 AC XY: 35AN XY: 74418 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at