chr15-98649609-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting
The NM_000875.5(IGF1R):c.28C>T(p.Pro10Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000118 in 1,609,654 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P10R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000875.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000875.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGF1R | MANE Select | c.28C>T | p.Pro10Ser | missense | Exon 1 of 21 | ENSP00000497069.1 | P08069 | ||
| IGF1R | TSL:1 | n.28C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 1 of 10 | |||||
| IGF1R | c.28C>T | p.Pro10Ser | missense | Exon 1 of 21 | ENSP00000496919.1 | C9J5X1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 151276Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000121 AC: 3AN: 247232 AF XY: 0.0000149 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000117 AC: 17AN: 1458282Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000179 AC XY: 13AN XY: 725532 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 151372Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 73970 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at