chr16-1079872-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001172560.3(SSTR5):c.1004C>A(p.Pro335Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P335L) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001172560.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001172560.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSTR5 | NM_001172560.3 | MANE Select | c.1004C>A | p.Pro335Gln | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | NP_001166031.1 | ||
| SSTR5 | NM_001053.4 | c.1004C>A | p.Pro335Gln | missense | Exon 1 of 1 | NP_001044.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSTR5 | ENST00000689027.1 | MANE Select | c.1004C>A | p.Pro335Gln | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000508487.1 | ||
| SSTR5 | ENST00000293897.7 | TSL:6 | c.1004C>A | p.Pro335Gln | missense | Exon 1 of 1 | ENSP00000293897.4 | ||
| SSTR5 | ENST00000711615.1 | c.1004C>A | p.Pro335Gln | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000518810.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 35
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 77
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 35
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at