chr16-10907940-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000246.4(CIITA):​c.2448C>T​(p.Ala816=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00432 in 1,562,952 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 24 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A816A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0026 ( 3 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0045 ( 21 hom. )

Consequence

CIITA
NM_000246.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -5.01
Variant links:
Genes affected
CIITA (HGNC:7067): (class II major histocompatibility complex transactivator) This gene encodes a protein with an acidic transcriptional activation domain, 4 LRRs (leucine-rich repeats) and a GTP binding domain. The protein is located in the nucleus and acts as a positive regulator of class II major histocompatibility complex gene transcription, and is referred to as the "master control factor" for the expression of these genes. The protein also binds GTP and uses GTP binding to facilitate its own transport into the nucleus. Once in the nucleus it does not bind DNA but rather uses an intrinsic acetyltransferase (AT) activity to act in a coactivator-like fashion. Mutations in this gene have been associated with bare lymphocyte syndrome type II (also known as hereditary MHC class II deficiency or HLA class II-deficient combined immunodeficiency), increased susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and possibly myocardial infarction. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 16-10907940-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-10907940-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 459195.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-10907940-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-5.01 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00262 (399/152346) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00417 (284/68032). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00377. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 177 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CIITANM_000246.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2448C>T p.Ala816= synonymous_variant 11/20 ENST00000324288.14

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CIITAENST00000324288.14 linkuse as main transcriptc.2448C>T p.Ala816= synonymous_variant 11/201 NM_000246.4 P4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00262
AC:
399
AN:
152228
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00128
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00122
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00417
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00431
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00251
AC:
519
AN:
206852
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00249
AC XY:
276
AN XY:
110920
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00155
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000537
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00314
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00155
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00428
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00329
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00451
AC:
6360
AN:
1410606
Hom.:
21
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.00432
AC XY:
3006
AN XY:
696514
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000757
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000746
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00297
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000234
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00167
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00539
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00433
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00262
AC:
399
AN:
152346
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00238
AC XY:
177
AN XY:
74506
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00127
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00122
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00417
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00426
Alfa
AF:
0.00217
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00268
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2023CIITA: BP4, BP7, BS2 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
MHC class II deficiency Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.84
CADD
Benign
0.49
DANN
Benign
0.67

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs112250421; hg19: chr16-11001797; API