chr16-10909070-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000246.4(CIITA):āc.2699A>Gā(p.Gln900Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.988 in 1,614,164 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 789,429 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q900W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000246.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIITA | NM_000246.4 | c.2699A>G | p.Gln900Arg | missense_variant | 12/20 | ENST00000324288.14 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIITA | ENST00000324288.14 | c.2699A>G | p.Gln900Arg | missense_variant | 12/20 | 1 | NM_000246.4 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.935 AC: 142214AN: 152164Hom.: 67214 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.983 AC: 246985AN: 251276Hom.: 121813 AF XY: 0.988 AC XY: 134218AN XY: 135874
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.993 AC: 1452103AN: 1461882Hom.: 722179 Cov.: 66 AF XY: 0.994 AC XY: 723049AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.934 AC: 142303AN: 152282Hom.: 67250 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.937 AC XY: 69760AN XY: 74476
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
MHC class II deficiency Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | phenotyping only | GenomeConnect, ClinGen | - | Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-27-2020 by Lab or GTR ID 500031. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. This variant was reported in an individual referred for clinical diagnostic genetic testing. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 28, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at