chr16-10915623-C-T

Position:

chr16-10915623-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_000246.4(CIITA):c.2942C>T(p.Thr981Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000062 in 1,614,122 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000054 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CIITA
NM_000246.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.989

Variant links:

Genes affected

CIITA (HGNC:7067): (class II major histocompatibility complex transactivator) This gene encodes a protein with an acidic transcriptional activation domain, 4 LRRs (leucine-rich repeats) and a GTP binding domain. The protein is located in the nucleus and acts as a positive regulator of class II major histocompatibility complex gene transcription, and is referred to as the "master control factor" for the expression of these genes. The protein also binds GTP and uses GTP binding to facilitate its own transport into the nucleus. Once in the nucleus it does not bind DNA but rather uses an intrinsic acetyltransferase (AT) activity to act in a coactivator-like fashion. Mutations in this gene have been associated with bare lymphocyte syndrome type II (also known as hereditary MHC class II deficiency or HLA class II-deficient combined immunodeficiency), increased susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and possibly myocardial infarction. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2013]

CIITA links:

CIITA (HGNC:):

CIITA links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.032827318).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000138 (21/152316) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.000915 (14/15302). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000553. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 15 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CIITA	NM_000246.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.2942C>T	p.Thr981Met	missense_variant	14/20	ENST00000324288.14	NP_000237.2	P33076A0A0B4J1S1Q66X48

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CIITA	ENST00000324288.14 linkuse as main transcript	c.2942C>T	p.Thr981Met	missense_variant	14/20	1	NM_000246.4	ENSP00000316328.8		A0A0B4J1S1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000138

AC:

AN:

152198

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000916

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000957

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000135

AC:

AN:

251432

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000118

AC XY:

AN XY:

135892

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000491

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000229

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000463

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000652

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000540

AC:

AN:

1461806

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000660

AC XY:

AN XY:

727212

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000447

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000255

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000375

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000243

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000828

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000138

AC:

AN:

152316

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000201

AC XY:

AN XY:

74490

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000915

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000947

Alfa

AF:

0.0000494

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000982

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000228

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000115

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

MHC class II deficiency

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Sep 06, 2022

This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 981 of the CIITA protein (p.Thr981Met). This variant is present in population databases (rs369744959, gnomAD 0.05%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CIITA-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 568716). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The methionine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.076

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.46

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.57

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.97

Eigen

Benign

-0.80

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.84

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.10

LIST_S2

Benign

0.66

T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.026

MetaRNN

Benign

0.033

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

PrimateAI

Benign

0.30

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.99

.;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.048

Sift

Benign

0.037

.;D;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.11

T;T;T

Vest4

0.082

MVP

0.59

MPC

0.13

ClinPred

0.016

GERP RS

2.6

gMVP

0.32

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.080

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over