chr16-11548080-G-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001136472.2(LITAF):c.*1557C>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 33)
Consequence
LITAF
NM_001136472.2 3_prime_UTR
NM_001136472.2 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.475
Genes affected
LITAF (HGNC:16841): (lipopolysaccharide induced TNF factor) Lipopolysaccharide is a potent stimulator of monocytes and macrophages, causing secretion of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and other inflammatory mediators. This gene encodes lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-alpha factor, which is a DNA-binding protein and can mediate the TNF-alpha expression by direct binding to the promoter region of the TNF-alpha gene. The transcription of this gene is induced by tumor suppressor p53 and has been implicated in the p53-induced apoptotic pathway. Mutations in this gene cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C (CMT1C) and may be involved in the carcinogenesis of extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD). Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LITAF | NM_001136472.2 | c.*1557C>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000622633.5 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LITAF | ENST00000622633.5 | c.*1557C>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_001136472.2 | P1 | ||
LITAF | ENST00000339430.9 | c.*1557C>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 4/4 | 1 | P1 | |||
LITAF | ENST00000571688.5 | c.*1557C>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 4/4 | 1 | P1 | |||
LITAF | ENST00000413364.6 | c.*1682C>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 5/5 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 0
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
0
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
33
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at