chr16-1587999-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_014714.4(IFT140):ā€‹c.836G>Cā€‹(p.Arg279Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0443 in 1,613,380 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,167 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.043 ( 248 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.044 ( 1919 hom. )

Consequence

IFT140
NM_014714.4 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.279
Variant links:
Genes affected
IFT140 (HGNC:29077): (intraflagellar transport 140) This gene encodes one of the subunits of the intraflagellar transport (IFT) complex A. Intraflagellar transport is involved in the genesis, resorption and signaling of primary cilia. The primary cilium is a microtubule-based sensory organelle at the surface of most quiescent mammalian cells, that receives signals from its environment, such as the flow of fluid, light or odors, and transduces those signals to the nucleus. Loss of the corresponding protein in mouse results in renal cystic disease. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0017949343).
BP6
Variant 16-1587999-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-1587999-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 129262.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-1587999-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr16-1587999-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.074 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
IFT140NM_014714.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.836G>C p.Arg279Pro missense_variant 8/31 ENST00000426508.7 NP_055529.2
LOC105371046NR_135176.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.59+7414C>G intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
IFT140ENST00000426508.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.836G>C p.Arg279Pro missense_variant 8/315 NM_014714.4 ENSP00000406012 P1Q96RY7-1
ENST00000563162.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.59+7414C>G intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 2
IFT140ENST00000439987.6 linkuse as main transcriptn.897G>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 7/192
IFT140ENST00000397417.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.329-3579G>C intron_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 5 ENSP00000380562

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0425
AC:
6471
AN:
152122
Hom.:
248
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00900
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00658
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0772
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0179
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0139
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.141
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0472
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0340
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0500
AC:
12510
AN:
250286
Hom.:
552
AF XY:
0.0471
AC XY:
6378
AN XY:
135344
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00754
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.102
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0142
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0168
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.133
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0448
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0487
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0444
AC:
64918
AN:
1461140
Hom.:
1919
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0437
AC XY:
31772
AN XY:
726864
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00753
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.104
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0155
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000227
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0166
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.128
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0440
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0396
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0426
AC:
6480
AN:
152240
Hom.:
248
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0462
AC XY:
3442
AN XY:
74428
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00900
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0777
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0179
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.141
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0472
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0336
Alfa
AF:
0.0250
Hom.:
25
Bravo
AF:
0.0361
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0415
AC:
154
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0397
AC:
153
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00773
AC:
34
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0442
AC:
380
ExAC
AF:
0.0452
AC:
5492
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00924
AC:
32
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0406
EpiControl
AF:
0.0380

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Saldino-Mainzer syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtJan 12, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 06, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.17
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.68
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.67
CADD
Benign
0.16
DANN
Benign
0.71
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0036
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.8
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.9
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.059
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.58
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0018
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.69
N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.20
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.11
N
REVEL
Benign
0.036
Sift
Benign
0.34
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.35
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.077
MPC
0.097
ClinPred
0.010
T
GERP RS
-11
Varity_R
0.079
gMVP
0.49

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4786350; hg19: chr16-1638000; API